C.R. Reddy Cancer Center · Leela Mahal Road, Nellore
Dr. Haritha ChiramanaMD, DMSenior medical oncologist & hemato-oncologistNellore Patient guides Book a Consultation
← All cancer sites

Brain Tumours

Adult glioma · Brain metastases · Paediatric CNS tumours · IDH · 1p/19q · MGMT · BRAF · H3 · Key points for clinicians · Last updated 9 October 2026

For health professionals. This section uses clinical terms and is general education for doctors, nurses and students, not advice for an individual patient. Patients and families: please read our patient guides instead, Cancer Myth Busters · Understanding your cancer report · Living through cancer treatment, or speak with your own doctor.

Who this page is for, and where to start

Printable PDFs for this moduleMini reviews, slides, algorithms, quick references and the MCQ booklet are on the Printable Teaching Resources page · Online MCQ bank. No PDF downloads are kept on this page.
For your patientsPlain-language Telugu–English answers for patients and families: the Brain tumour Myth Busters (35 myths), symptoms and warning signs and the Telugu handouts.
SurgeonsScreening and workup (03), local therapy with surgery types (05), algorithms (07), cases (11)
Physicians & oncologistsBiomarkers (04), systemic therapy (06), algorithms (07), survivorship (08), cases (11)
Postgraduate residentsOncology and other specialities: case vignettes (11), landmark trials (09) and 88 cited trials (12) for exams and journal clubs
Medical studentsAt a glance (01), presentation and common traps (02), the figures, and follow-up (08)

Prepared and reviewed by Dr. Haritha Chiramana, MD, DM, Senior Medical Oncologist & Hemato-Oncologist, C.R. Reddy Cancer Center, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. She teaches oncology to postgraduates and medical students; colleges and departments may write to info@drharitha.co.in for teaching sessions. Printable Teaching Resources and how to cite → Phone 0861 232 5344 · WhatsApp +91 79896 42272.

01 At a glance
  • India records about 32,000 new brain and CNS cancers and 28,000 deaths a year (GLOBOCAN 2022; malignant tumours only, so benign meningiomas and most childhood low-grade gliomas are not counted). Brain tumours are among the commonest causes of cancer death in children and young adults.
  • In adults over 40, metastases are commoner than all primary brain tumours combined (lung, breast, melanoma, kidney, gastrointestinal). Among primary tumours, meningiomas and gliomas make up about two-thirds; glioblastoma is the commonest malignant one (median age about 64).
  • Diffuse gliomas are now named by molecular markers (WHO 2021): IDH-mutant astrocytoma (grade 2–4), IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma (grade 2–3) and IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (grade 4). Prognosis ranges from a median of about 15 months to 15–20 years.
  • Children have different tumours: low-grade glioma (30–40%), medulloblastoma and other embryonal tumours, ependymoma and diffuse midline glioma, about half in the posterior fossa. Many are curable; late effects of treatment shape lifelong care.
  • The avoidable harms in Indian practice are delay and mislabelling: seizures treated for years without a scan, ring lesions called tuberculoma without proof, steroids given before a biopsy when lymphoma is possible, and morning vomiting in a child blamed on acidity.
Adults (all intracranial tumours): metastases outnumber primary tumoursMetastases · >50%MeningiomaGliomaPituitary, schwannoma, otherChildren (primary CNS tumours, the commonest solid cancers of childhood)Low-grade glioma · 30–40%Embryonal (medulloblastoma)High-grade glioma / DIPGEpendymomaOtherAdult diffuse glioma• Defined by IDH, 1p/19q and other markers• Glioblastoma: commonest malignant primary• Seizure, focal deficit, raised pressureBrain metastases• Lung, breast, melanoma, kidney, GI• Often found by staging MRI• SRS and CNS-active drugs changed outcomesChildren• Half in the posterior fossa• Vomiting, ataxia, squint, head tilt• Many cured; late effects matter
Figure 1. Three working groups. In adults most brain masses are metastases; among primary tumours, meningioma and glioma dominate. In children, low-grade glioma and medulloblastoma lead, and about half arise in the posterior fossa. Proportions are approximate (CBTRUS and hospital series).
02 Clinical presentation, common traps & genetic causes

Who is at risk

FactorSize of riskClinical note
Ionising radiation to the headThe only firmly established environmental cause; risk rises with dose and young age at exposureChildhood cranial RT (leukaemia, tinea capitis era) → meningioma, glioma, nerve sheath tumours decades later.
Hereditary syndromesAbout 1–5% of brain tumoursNF1 (optic pathway glioma in 10–15%), NF2-related schwannomatosis (bilateral vestibular schwannoma), tuberous sclerosis (SEGA), Li-Fraumeni (choroid plexus carcinoma, SHH medulloblastoma), von Hippel-Lindau (haemangioblastoma), Gorlin (SHH medulloblastoma), FAP (medulloblastoma).
Constitutional or Lynch mismatch-repair deficiencyRare; enriched in young adults with gliomaCafé-au-lait spots, consanguinity, early bowel or blood cancers in the family: check MMR proteins and refer for genetics.
Age and sexGlioblastoma peaks at 55–75, commoner in men; meningioma commoner in womenLow-grade gliomas peak in young adults.
Allergy and atopyConsistently associated with lower glioma riskNot used clinically.
Not establishedMobile phones, power lines, head injury, diet, stressReassure without dismissing the question (see the Myth Buster on phones).

How brain tumours present

FeatureHow oftenWhat to know
HeadachePresenting in about 20%; at some point in about halfUsually tension-like; the classic morning headache with vomiting is uncommon (about 5% meet the "triad"). Isolated headache with a normal examination is rarely a tumour.
Seizure50–80% of primary tumours (most in low-grade and IDH-mutant gliomas); 10–20% of metastasesOften focal (smell, déjà vu, limb jerking) and stereotyped; a first adult seizure needs MRI.
Focal deficitCommon in high-grade glioma and metastasesWeakness that improves on steroids is usually oedema, not tumour destruction.
Cognitive or personality changeFrontal and corpus callosum tumours, multiple metastasesOften mistaken for depression or dementia.
Raised pressurePosterior fossa, large or haemorrhagic tumoursHeadache worse lying down or with coughing, vomiting, papilloedema, transient visual obscurations; a sudden collapse can be a pressure wave, not a seizure.
Image the brain (MRI with contrast) when• New headache over 50, or a changed headache pattern• Headache with vomiting, worse lying down, waking from sleep• Headache with focal signs, confusion or papilloedema• First seizure in an adult (not provoked)• Progressive weakness, speech, vision or personality change• Any neurological symptom in a person with known cancer• Child: morning vomiting, ataxia, new squint, head tilt, regressionCommon traps in Indian practice• Ring lesion called tuberculoma or NCC without the full picture• Steroids started before biopsy when lymphoma is possible• Seizure treated for years with no scan• Morning vomiting in a child treated as acidity or worms• Normal plain CT taken as the end of the work-up• Confusion in a cancer patient blamed on “weakness”Isolated headache with a normal neurological examination is rarely a tumour (about 1.5% of headache MRIs); only asmall minority of brain tumours present with headache alone.
Figure 2. When to scan, and what delays diagnosis. Headache is common but seldom isolated in brain tumours; the red flags are the pattern, the age and the company it keeps.
Cerebral hemispheresSuprasellarPonsCerebellum · 4th ventriclePosterior fossa (~half)Pilocytic astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, DIPG (pons).Morning vomiting, ataxia, head tilt, hydrocephalus.Suprasellar / opticCraniopharyngioma, optic pathway glioma (NF1), germ cell tumour.Vision loss, short stature, polyuria, early puberty.HemispheresLow-grade glioneuronal tumours (seizures), high-grade gliomas.Seizures, weakness, behaviour change.InfantsLarge head, bulging fontanelle, sunset eyes, loss of milestones.Embryonal tumours, ATRT.
Figure 3. Children: location predicts the tumour and the symptoms. Image a child with headache that wakes them or is worse lying down, persistent morning vomiting, a new squint, ataxia, regression of skills or age ≤6 with headache.
LesionImaging and clinical clueNext stepMetastasisGrey–white junction, often multiple, much oedema;known or occult primaryCT chest-abdomen-pelvis; biopsy theeasiest siteGlioblastomaThick irregular rim, necrosis, crosses corpuscallosumResection or biopsy; IDH, MGMTPrimary CNS lymphomaPeriventricular, homogeneous, restricted diffusionNO steroids before biopsy; HIV test;slit-lampPyogenic abscessThin smooth rim; centre restricts on diffusionSource, cultures, drainageTuberculomaConglomerate rings, basal meningitis, chest TBTissue or CSF proof where possibleNeurocysticercosisCyst with scolex (dot), often several, seizuresSerology, CT calcifications; usuallysmallTumefactive demyelinationOpen (incomplete) ring, little mass effectMRI spine, CSF; biopsy if unsure
Figure 4. A ring-enhancing lesion is not a diagnosis. Diffusion-weighted MRI, the clinical setting and a search for a primary narrow it down; tissue settles it. Give steroids only for threatening oedema until lymphoma has been excluded.
  • Ring lesions in India: tuberculoma and neurocysticercosis are common and real, but so are metastases, glioblastoma and lymphoma. A single ring lesion that grows on antituberculous treatment, or any lesion in a person over 40 with a smoking history or weight loss, needs a search for a primary and usually tissue.
  • Steroids and lymphoma: dexamethasone can shrink primary CNS lymphoma within days and make the biopsy non-diagnostic. If a periventricular, homogeneously enhancing, diffusion-restricting lesion is seen and the patient is not deteriorating, withhold steroids until tissue is taken.
  • Known cancer plus a new neurological symptom is a brain metastasis or leptomeningeal disease until MRI says otherwise; ask for MRI with contrast, not plain CT.
  • Children: isolated headache at presentation is rare (0–1%); look for the company it keeps: morning vomiting, ataxia, head tilt, new squint, poor school performance, a growing head in an infant, loss of milestones, growth failure or polyuria. Neuroimaging is warranted for headache in a child aged 6 or under.
03 Screening, workup & staging essentials
SuspicionHistory, full neuroexam, fundiMRI with contrastT1, T2/FLAIR, DWI,SWI, post-contrastIs it metastatic?Known cancer? CTchest-abdomen-pelvisNeurosurgical MDTResect, biopsy, ortreat as metastasisIntegrated diagnosisHistology + IDH,1p/19q, MGMT, H3,BRAFBefore surgery• Steroids only if symptomatic oedema (not if lymphoma likely)• Antiseizure drug only after a seizure• Spine MRI if leptomeningeal or paediatric embryonalAfter surgery• MRI within 24–48 hours to measure the resection• Molecular report before choosing therapy• Children: spine MRI and CSF for medulloblastoma, ependymoma
Figure 5. From suspicion to an integrated diagnosis. MRI is usually the only test needed before surgery for a likely glioma; tissue with molecular testing is required for nearly every tumour except typical optic pathway glioma, tectal glioma and DIPG.

Imaging: what each sequence tells you

FindingSuggests
Non-enhancing T2/FLAIR mass, little oedemaLower-grade glioma (though up to half of grade 2 oligodendrogliomas enhance faintly, and absence of enhancement does not exclude grade 3)
T2–FLAIR mismatch (bright on T2, dark centre on FLAIR)IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-intact astrocytoma: highly specific
Calcification on CT, cortical involvement, frontalOligodendroglioma
Thick irregular ring, central necrosis, crosses corpus callosumGlioblastoma (or lymphoma if solid and homogeneous)
Multiple round lesions at the grey–white junction with disproportionate oedemaMetastases
Restricted diffusion in the cavity centreAbscess; restricted solid tumour: lymphoma, medulloblastoma
Dural-based, dural tail, homogeneous enhancementMeningioma (or solitary fibrous tumour, dural metastasis)
  • MRI with contrast is usually the only test needed before surgery for a likely glioma; CT is for emergencies, bone detail and patients who cannot have MRI. Do not screen the body for a primary when imaging strongly suggests glioma.
  • When a metastasis is likely: CT chest-abdomen-pelvis (or PET-CT); biopsy the most accessible site. A single lesion without a known primary may be resected for diagnosis.
  • Tissue is needed for almost every tumour (maximal safe resection or stereotactic biopsy). Exceptions where imaging is enough: typical DIPG, optic pathway glioma (especially with NF1) and tectal glioma.
  • Postoperative MRI within 24–48 hours measures the extent of resection before surgical changes enhance.
  • Grading in adult glioma is integrated: histology plus IDH, 1p/19q, CDKN2A/B and, in IDH-wildtype tumours, TERT, EGFR and chromosome 7/10. Ask for an integrated report; sampling error at biopsy can under-grade.
  • Prognosis in metastases: the disease-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA[1]) uses performance status, age, extracranial disease, number of lesions and tumour genotype; median survival now ranges from about 8 to 16 months and is longer with CNS-active drugs.
  • Staging in children: MRI of the whole spine and CSF cytology (lumbar, about 2 weeks after surgery) for medulloblastoma, ependymoma and other embryonal or germ cell tumours; serum and CSF AFP and β-hCG for suprasellar or pineal tumours; endocrine and visual assessment for suprasellar lesions.
Maximal safe resection• Goal for accessible gliomas• Gross total → longer survival• Awake mapping for eloquent areas• MRI in 24–48 h to confirmStereotactic biopsy• Deep, multifocal or eloquent• Lymphoma suspected• Risk: sampling error, undergrading• Enough tissue for molecular testsShunt / ETV / resection• Obstructive hydrocephalus• Posterior fossa tumours in children• Large metastasis with mass effect• Diagnostic doubt about a “metastasis”Patchell 1990: in single metastases, 11% turned out not to be metastases at surgery. Tissue is worth having when the story does not fit.
Figure 6. What the neurosurgeon offers. Resection gives tissue, relieves mass effect and, for gliomas, prolongs survival when it is safe; biopsy is for deep, diffuse or lymphoma-like lesions.
04 Biomarkers that change treatment

In this section: How gliomas develop (molecular pathogenesis) · Molecular markers: what each one means

Diffuse glioma on histologytest IDH1/2 (IHC R132H, then sequencing)IDH-mutantIDH-wildtypeOligodendroglioma• 1p/19q codeleted (ATRX kept, TERT mutant)• Grade 2 or 3• Most chemosensitive; median survival 15–20 yAstrocytoma, IDH-mutant• 1p/19q intact; ATRX lost, TP53 mutant• Grade 2, 3 or 4• CDKN2A/B deleted = grade 4Glioblastoma• Necrosis or microvascular proliferation• or TERT, EGFR or +7/−10 alone• Grade 4; median ~15 monthsMidline glioma in a child or young adult: test H3 K27 (diffuse midline glioma, grade 4).Hemispheric high-grade glioma in teenagers and young adults: test H3 G34.Also test MGMT promoter methylation (glioblastoma: prognostic and predictive) and BRAF V600E where relevant.
Figure 7. How the 2021 WHO classification names a diffuse glioma. Molecular markers now outrank appearance: an IDH-wildtype astrocytoma with a TERT mutation is a glioblastoma even if it looks low grade, and a CDKN2A/B-deleted IDH-mutant astrocytoma is grade 4.
IDH1/2 mutationSeparatesastrocytoma/oligodendroglioma fromglioblastoma; better prognosis;vorasidenib for residual grade 21p/19q codeletionDefines oligodendroglioma; RT plusPCV or temozolomide; longestsurvivalMGMT methylationGlioblastoma: predicts temozolomidebenefit; guides treatment in olderadultsCDKN2A/B deletionIDH-mutant astrocytoma becomes grade4 regardless of histologyTERT, EGFR, +7/−10IDH-wildtype astrocytoma =glioblastoma even without necrosisBRAF V600EDabrafenib + trametinib (children:first line in LGG; adults:recurrent)H3 K27 alterationDiffuse midline glioma, grade 4;dordaviprone at recurrenceMMR deficiency / hypermutationGermline CMMRD or Lynch; checkpointinhibitors in selected casesNTRK or other fusionsTumour-agnostic TRK inhibitors(larotrectinib, entrectinib)
Figure 8. Tests that change treatment. Ask for IDH, 1p/19q and MGMT on every adult diffuse glioma; H3 and BRAF in children and young adults. Many centres in India send blocks for NGS or methylation profiling; plan this at the first MDT.
  • IDH: immunohistochemistry for IDH1 R132H finds about 90% of mutations; if negative in a grade 2–3 glioma or a patient under 55, sequence IDH1 codon 132 and IDH2 codon 172.
  • 1p/19q must be whole-arm codeletion (NGS, methylation array or LOH); FISH alone can mislead. Retained ATRX with no p53 overexpression in an IDH-mutant tumour points to oligodendroglioma.
  • MGMT: methylated in about 40–50% of glioblastomas; median survival 21.7 vs 15.3 months with temozolomide when methylated, with little gain when unmethylated (Hegi 2005[2]). Assays vary; if unknown, treat with temozolomide.
  • Methylation profiling classifies tumours that histology cannot (paediatric-type high-grade gliomas, ependymoma groups, embryonal tumours). Plan referral of tissue blocks early; results take weeks.
  • Paediatric low-grade glioma almost always has one MAPK-pathway driver: KIAA1549-BRAF fusion (most cerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas), BRAF V600E (about 15–20% overall; worse with chemotherapy alone), FGFR1/2 or NF1 loss. Each now has a matched drug.
  • Medulloblastoma groups: WNT (excellent prognosis), SHH (test TP53; germline TP53, SUFU or PTCH1 common), group 3 (MYC, worst) and group 4. Group drives risk-adapted therapy and trial entry.
  • Brain metastases: re-test the metastasis when it changes treatment (EGFR, ALK, HER2, BRAF); genotype also feeds the GPA score.

How gliomas develop: molecular pathogenesis

Diffuse gliomas that look alike under the microscope arise along different molecular routes, from different cells, at different ages. Knowing the route explains the WHO classification, the prognosis, why some tumours respond to chemotherapy and why many targeted drugs have failed. Summarised in our own words from the primary studies (TCGA 2008[3], TCGA 2015[4], GLASS 2019[5]).

Cell of originFounder eventsProgression eventsClinical courseIDH-mutantastrocytomaCortical glialprogenitor(OPC-like)IDH1/2TP53 + ATRXALT telomeresCDKN2A/B lossPDGFRA, PI3KHypermutationGrade 2 → 3 → 4over yearsOligodendrogliomaCortical glialprogenitor(OPC-like)IDH1/21p/19q (t(1;19))TERT promoterCIC, FUBP1CDKN2A/B (rare)Extra copy changesSlowest; grade 2 →3Glioblastoma,IDH-wildtypeSubventricular-zoneneural stem cellTERT promoter+7 / −10EGFR ampPTEN, NF1CDKN2A/B, CDK4VEGF angiogenesisDe novo; monthsIDH mutation is the first (truncal) event in both IDH-mutant routes and is never lost; 1p/19q codeletion follows it.Glioblastoma starts without IDH, usually with TERT.
Figure 9. Three different diseases, not three grades of one. IDH-mutant gliomas start in cortical glial progenitors with an IDH mutation and progress slowly; IDH-wildtype glioblastoma starts in subventricular-zone stem cells, often with TERT mutation, and presents de novo. Drawn from Lee 2018, Park 2026, TCGA 2015 and Barthel 2019.
TumourStarting eventCo-operating eventsProgression and recurrenceWhat it means in clinic
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutantIDH1/2 mutation in a cortical glial progenitorTP53 mutation, ATRX loss → alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT)CDKN2A/B deletion, PDGFRA amplification, PI3K mutations, genome-wide instability; hypermutation after temozolomideSlow but relentless; grade rises over years; CDKN2A/B loss = grade 4; IDH inhibitors act on the founding event
OligodendrogliomaIDH1/2 mutationWhole-arm 1p/19q loss from one t(1;19) translocation; TERT promoter mutation; CIC (about 70%) and FUBP1 mutationsExtra copy-number changes; CDKN2A/B loss in a fewMost chemosensitive glioma (hypermethylation silences MGMT and other repair genes); survival measured in decades
Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtypeLow-level drivers (often TERT promoter) in subventricular-zone stem cellsChromosome +7/−10 (PTEN), EGFR amplification ± vIII, CDKN2A/B or CDK4/RB changes, NF1, PDGFRA, METEarly changes are kept at relapse; hypermutation after temozolomide in a minorityRapid, infiltrative, angiogenic; most relapse within 2 cm; no single-pathway drug has worked
Paediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomaHistone H3 K27M (midline) or G34R/V (hemispheric); or H3/IDH-wildtype with PDGFRA, EGFR or MYCNACVR1 (H3.1 DIPG), TP53, ATRX–DAXX, PDGFRAUsually rapidDifferent diseases from adult glioblastoma: diagnose by H3 status and methylation; trials target the epigenome (for example dordaviprone)
Paediatric-type low-grade gliomaOne MAPK-pathway driver: KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, BRAF V600E, FGFR1, NF1 loss, MYB/MYBL1Usually none (genetically simple)Rarely transforms (more with BRAF V600E + CDKN2A loss)Matched MAPK inhibitors work; oncogene-induced senescence explains slow growth
RTK / RAS / PI3K growth signalling• EGFR amplification (~40%), EGFRvIII• PDGFRA, MET amplification; FGFR–TACC fusion• PTEN loss (chromosome 10 loss 60–85%)• NF1 loss; PI3K mutation• → proliferation and survivalp53 pathway• TP53 mutation (most IDH-mutant astrocytomas)• MDM2/MDM4 amplification• CDKN2A loss removes p14ARF• → escape from apoptosis• → genomic instabilityRB / cell-cycle pathway• CDKN2A/B deletion (p16, p15)• CDK4 or CDK6 amplification (10–15%)• RB1 loss (13q loss in about a third)• Usually only one of these per tumour• → unchecked G1→S entryChildren and young adults: the histone route (epigenetic “oncohistones”)H3 K27M (H3.3 or H3.1 genes; EZHIP mimics it) blocks the PRC2 complex → global loss of H3K27 trimethylation →developmental genes stay switched on.Midline (pons, thalamus, spinal cord); DIPG often adds ACVR1 (H3.1) and TP53/PDGFRA changes. H3 G34R/V acts in hemispherictumours of teenagers.H3 mutations are mutually exclusive with IDH mutation: each defines a separate disease (Sturm 2012). Paediatric LGGinstead has a single MAPK driver (BRAF, FGFR1, NF1, MYB).
Figure 10. The three core pathways defined by TCGA (2008): nearly every glioblastoma breaks each of them somewhere. Children’s high-grade gliomas are driven mainly by histone mutations that rewire the epigenome rather than by the adult pattern.

Cell of origin

  • IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: deep sequencing of tumour, normal cortex and subventricular-zone (SVZ) tissue showed astrocyte-like neural stem cells in the SVZ carrying low-level driver mutations, which then migrate and acquire further mutations (Lee 2018[6]). This fits the frequent periventricular location and the de novo presentation.
  • IDH-mutant gliomas: sampling of tumour and adjacent cortex points to cortical glial progenitors (oligodendrocyte-precursor-like cells) that already carry the IDH mutation. This fits their cortical, frontal-lobe location and their tendency to cause seizures.

How an IDH mutation makes a glioma

  • IDH mutations were discovered in 12% of glioblastomas in 2008 (Parsons 2008[7]) and then found in most lower-grade gliomas (Yan 2009[8]). They are heterozygous, hit the active site (IDH1 R132, IDH2 R172) and occur first; every tumour cell carries them.
  • A new function, not a lost one: the mutant enzyme converts alpha-ketoglutarate into the oncometabolite R-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) (Dang 2009[9]). 2-HG competitively blocks alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent enzymes: TET DNA demethylases and histone demethylases.
  • Hypermethylation (G-CIMP): the result is a CpG-island methylator phenotype across the genome (Noushmehr 2010[10]); an IDH1 mutation alone is enough to create it (Turcan 2012[11]). Differentiation genes are silenced, cells stay progenitor-like, and MGMT is methylated in almost every IDH-mutant glioma.
  • Insulator failure: methylation stops CTCF from binding chromatin boundaries, so an enhancer reaches and switches on the PDGFRA oncogene (Flavahan 2016[12]).
  • Immune escape: 2-HG released by tumour cells suppresses T-cell activation in the microenvironment (Bunse 2018[13]), one reason IDH-mutant gliomas are immunologically "cold".
  • Why this matters: (1) IDH inhibitors such as vorasidenib lower 2-HG and slowed growth of grade 2 tumours in INDIGO; the effect is greatest early, before additional drivers accumulate. (2) The hypermethylated state silences DNA repair, which helps explain the chemosensitivity of oligodendroglioma. (3) 2-HG can be measured by MR spectroscopy.

The IDH-mutant astrocytoma route

  • After IDH, the tumour inactivates TP53 (usually a missense mutation in the DNA-binding domain, hotspots at codons 175, 248 and 273, with loss of the other allele) and ATRX (over 70% of grade 2–3 tumours). ATRX loss lets cells keep their telomeres by alternative lengthening (ALT) instead of telomerase.
  • Progression is driven by CDKN2A/B deletion, RTK/PI3K activation (PDGFRA amplification, PIK3CA mutations), genome-wide copy-number instability and, at recurrence after temozolomide, hypermutation. These tumours were previously called "secondary glioblastoma" when they reached grade 4.
  • Longitudinal cohorts show that recurrent tumours lose methylation as the cell cycle speeds up, which is now being used to refine grading.

The oligodendroglioma route

  • After IDH, a single unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 1 and 19 is followed by loss of the derivative chromosome, deleting the whole of 1p and 19q in one step (Jenkins 2006[14]).
  • The remaining copies of tumour-suppressor genes on the lost arms are then mutated: CIC on 19q (about 70%) and FUBP1 on 1p (Bettegowda 2011[15]). Their exact roles are still unclear.
  • Telomeres are maintained by TERT promoter mutation rather than ATRX loss, so TERT and ATRX alterations are mutually exclusive. A small TERT-wildtype subset in young patients may behave even more favourably.

The IDH-wildtype glioblastoma route

  • Telomerase: TERT promoter mutations (55–80%) are among the earliest events.
  • Three core pathways (TCGA 2008[3]): growth signalling through RTK/RAS/PI3K (EGFR amplification in about 40%, a third of these with the constitutively active EGFRvIII; PDGFRA, MET; PTEN loss with chromosome 10 loss in 60–85%; NF1 loss); the p53 pathway (TP53, MDM2/MDM4, p14ARF); and the RB cell-cycle pathway (CDKN2A/B deletion, CDK4 amplification in 10–15%, RB1 loss). Within the RB pathway, tumours usually carry only one of these hits.
  • Autocrine loops and rare fusions: tumour cells often make both a growth factor and its receptor (PDGF, EGF, HGF/MET, FGF). Rare FGFR3–TACC3 fusions (Singh 2012[16]) are mutually exclusive with EGFR, PDGFR and MET amplification and are trial targets.
  • Angiogenesis and necrosis: microthrombosis and hypoxia trigger HIF, which drives VEGF; hypoxic cells migrate away from necrotic zones, forming pseudopalisades around necrosis and microvascular proliferation. This explains the ring of enhancement, why bevacizumab reduces oedema and enhancement so quickly, and why that imaging response does not prolong survival.
  • Heterogeneity: expression profiling defined proneural, neural, classical and mesenchymal subtypes (Verhaak 2010[17]), but single-cell sequencing found several subtypes inside one tumour (Patel 2014[18]). One tumour, many clones: a key reason single-pathway drugs (EGFR, mTOR, PDGFR inhibitors) have failed.

Treatment shapes the tumour

  • After temozolomide, about a quarter to a half of recurrent gliomas become hypermutated, usually through loss of mismatch-repair genes such as MSH6 (Cahill 2007[19]); this is much rarer after nitrosoureas or radiotherapy alone. MSH6 loss makes the tumour resistant to further temozolomide.
  • Unlike germline mismatch-repair deficiency, treatment-induced hypermutation has not translated into responses to checkpoint inhibitors (Touat 2020[20]).
  • Founder events (IDH, 1p/19q, TERT) persist at relapse; progression events (CDKN2A/B loss, PDGFRA, PI3K, hypermutation) are often new, which is why re-biopsy at recurrence can change the grade and the options (GLASS 2019[5]).

Paediatric gliomas: a different biology

  • Oncohistones: recurrent mutations in histone H3 genes are found in about 30% of paediatric high-grade gliomas (Schwartzentruber 2012[21]). K27M blocks the PRC2 methyltransferase, wiping out H3K27 trimethylation across the genome and locking cells in a developmental state; G34R/V changes a different histone mark in hemispheric tumours.
  • H3 and IDH mutations are mutually exclusive and define separate epigenetic and clinical groups (Sturm 2012[22]). DIPG often adds ACVR1 mutations (with H3.1 K27M), TP53 or PDGFRA changes.
  • The H3-wildtype, IDH-wildtype paediatric-type high-grade glioma (PDGFRA, EGFR or MYCN amplification) is best diagnosed by DNA methylation profiling, and the same profile has been found in adults up to 70.
  • Low-grade gliomas of childhood are genetically simple: one MAPK-pathway driver (KIAA1549-BRAF fusion, BRAF V600E, FGFR1 duplication or fusion, NF1 loss, MYB/MYBL1). This explains their excellent survival, their responses to RAF and MEK inhibitors and their rare transformation.

From biology to the clinic

  • The route sets the name and the grade: IDH and 1p/19q split three adult diseases; CDKN2A/B loss signals a late, aggressive stage; TERT, EGFR and +7/−10 identify an early glioblastoma that looks low grade.
  • Founding events make the best targets: IDH (vorasidenib), BRAF V600E (dabrafenib + trametinib), NTRK fusions (TRK inhibitors), H3 K27M (dordaviprone, under study). Late, subclonal or redundant pathways (EGFR, PI3K/mTOR, CDK4/6) have not yielded effective drugs.
  • Epigenetic state predicts chemotherapy: MGMT methylation (glioblastoma) and the hypermethylated IDH-mutant state (especially oligodendroglioma) mean alkylating drugs work.
  • Tumour biology, not location alone, now drives trial eligibility; keep tissue and request molecular profiling at diagnosis and at recurrence.

Molecular markers in gliomas: what each one means

Since 2021 the name and grade of a diffuse glioma depend on its molecular profile, and several markers also predict which treatment will work. A marker can be diagnostic (defines the tumour type), prognostic (tells you how it will behave, whatever the treatment) or predictive (tells you whether a specific treatment will help). Most important markers do more than one job.

IDH1/2 mutation2-hydroxyglutarateCpG hypermethylationMGMT silencedAlkylator sensitiveMarkerDiagnosticPrognosticPredictivePractical consequenceIDH1/2 mutationVorasidenib (grade 2, residual)1p/19q codeletionRT + PCV; most chemosensitiveATRX loss / TP53Lineage surrogate (astrocytoma)MGMT methylationTemozolomide benefit; elderly choiceCDKN2A/B deletionUpgrades to grade 4TERT, EGFR, +7/−10Defines glioblastoma; no targeted drug yetH3 K27 / H3 G34Grade 4; dordaviprone (K27M)BRAF V600EDabrafenib + trametinibBRAF fusion, FGFR, MYBTovorafenib, MEK inhibitors; trialsNTRK fusionLarotrectinib, entrectinibMMR loss / hypermutationGermline CMMRD: anti-PD-1; post-TMZ: little benefit
Figure 11. What each marker is for. Top: why IDH-mutant gliomas are chemosensitive (the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate blocks DNA demethylation, so MGMT is silenced). Filled circles mark established diagnostic, prognostic and predictive roles; a predictive role means the result changes which treatment works.
Step 1 · Histology + immunohistochemistry panel on every diffuse glioma: IDH1 R132H · ATRX · p53 · Ki-67Add H3 K27M and H3K27me3 (midline) · H3 G34 (young, hemispheric) · BRAF V600E/VE1 (young or epithelioid)IDH1 R132H positive• ATRX lost / p53 strong → astrocytoma (1p/19q not needed)• ATRX retained → test 1p/19q (NGS or methylation; FISH with care)• Then CDKN2A/B (grade 4 if deleted)IDH1 R132H negative• Under 55 or grade 2–3: sequence IDH1 (132) and IDH2 (172)• Midline: H3 K27 alteration• Hemispheric, young: H3 G34• Child: BRAF, FGFR1, MYB/MYBL1, NTRK (RNA NGS)IDH-wildtype adult, low grade• TERT promoter, EGFR amplification, +7/−10 → glioblastoma, grade 4• None present and H3 wild-type → astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype, NEC• Methylation profiling to resolveStep 2 · Treatment-guiding tests: MGMT promoter methylation (every glioblastoma; key over 65)BRAF V600E · NTRK/FGFR fusions · MMR and tumour mutational burden when hypermutation or a syndrome is suspectedUnresolved, unusual or paediatric tumour → DNA methylation profiling (also gives copy number and MGMT status).
Figure 12. A stepwise testing pathway. Cheap immunohistochemistry answers most questions; sequencing, copy-number testing and methylation profiling are added only where the answer would change the diagnosis or the treatment.

Adult-type diffuse gliomas: marker by marker

MarkerWhat it is · where it is foundHow it is testedClinical relevancePitfalls
IDH1 / IDH2 mutationHotspot mutation in a Krebs-cycle enzyme (IDH1 R132, IDH2 R172). The mutant enzyme makes 2-hydroxyglutarate, which blocks DNA and histone demethylases and causes a CpG-island hypermethylated state. It is the earliest (truncal) event in these tumours.
Found in: Most adult grade 2–3 diffuse gliomas; nearly all are under 55 (Yan 2009[8])
IHC for IDH1 R132H finds about 90%; sequence IDH1 codon 132 and IDH2 codon 172 if IHC is negative (10–20% are non-canonical). 2-HG can be seen on MR spectroscopy.Diagnostic: splits astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma from glioblastoma. Prognostic: much longer survival. Predictive: vorasidenib for residual grade 2 (INDIGO[23]).A negative IHC is not IDH-wildtype in young or lower-grade tumours. IDH1 R132C suggests Li-Fraumeni: consider germline TP53.
1p/19q codeletionLoss of the whole short arm of chromosome 1 and long arm of 19 after an unbalanced t(1;19) translocation. CIC (19q, about 70%) and FUBP1 (1p) mutations often accompany it.
Found in: Defines oligodendroglioma; always with IDH mutation, usually with TERT promoter mutation
NGS or methylation-array copy number (whole-arm). FISH is widely used but cannot prove whole-arm loss.Diagnostic for oligodendroglioma. Prognostic: median survival 15–20 years. Predictive: marked benefit from PCV with RT (EORTC 26951/RTOG 9402[24])."Codeletion" without IDH mutation means partial deletions: look for glioblastoma features. Not needed when ATRX loss or p53 overexpression already shows an astrocytoma.
ATRX lossChromatin remodeller; loss allows alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT).
Found in: More than 70% of grade 2–3 IDH-mutant astrocytomas; mutually exclusive with 1p/19q codeletion and TERT mutation
IHC: loss of nuclear staining in tumour cells, retained in vessels (internal control)Diagnostic surrogate: IDH-mutant + ATRX lost = astrocytoma.Also lost in H3 G34-mutant gliomas, which are IDH-wildtype: do not call these IDH-mutant astrocytoma without IDH proof.
TP53 mutationTumour suppressor; mutation of one copy plus loss of the other.
Found in: Most IDH-mutant astrocytomas; also many glioblastomas
IHC (strong, diffuse nuclear p53) as surrogate; sequencingDiagnostic support for astrocytic lineage with ATRX loss.Young patient, family cancers or IDH1 R132C: think Li-Fraumeni.
MGMT promoter methylationEpigenetic silencing of the DNA-repair enzyme that removes the methyl lesion made by temozolomide and lomustine.
Found in: 40–50% of glioblastomas (30–60% depending on assay); almost all IDH-mutant gliomas (part of the hypermethylated state)
Methylation-specific PCR, pyrosequencing or methylation array; no universal cut-off, and a "grey zone" existsPrognostic and predictive in glioblastoma: median 21.7 vs 15.3 months with temozolomide if methylated, little gain if not (Hegi 2005[2]). Decides temozolomide alone vs RT alone in older or frail patients. Predicts pseudoprogression.Unknown or failed test: still give temozolomide to fit patients. Not routinely needed in oligodendroglioma. Small biopsies often fail.
CDKN2A/B homozygous deletionLoss of both copies of the 9p21 cell-cycle brakes (p16, p14ARF, p15).
Found in: Subset of IDH-mutant astrocytomas (more at recurrence); about 7% of grade 3 oligodendrogliomas; many glioblastomas
FISH, NGS or methylation-array copy numberGrading: IDH-mutant astrocytoma becomes grade 4 regardless of histology (cIMPACT-NOW update 5[25], Shirahata 2018[26]). Prognostic: CATNON median 3 vs 9.6 years.Hemizygous loss or mutation does not upgrade by itself. Biopsy can miss a deleted subclone.
TERT promoter mutationHotspot mutations (C228T, C250T) that switch on telomerase.
Found in: Most oligodendrogliomas; 55–80% of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas
Targeted sequencing (make sure the panel covers the promoter)Diagnostic: in an IDH-wildtype adult astrocytoma it establishes glioblastoma, grade 4 (cIMPACT-NOW update 3[27]). Prognostic depends on context (Eckel-Passow 2015[28]).A small group of "TERT-only", non-enhancing IDH-wildtype tumours may behave better than glioblastoma: discuss at MDT before maximal treatment in frail patients.
EGFR amplification (± EGFRvIII)Many extra copies of the EGFR gene; about a third also carry the truncated, constitutively active variant III.
Found in: About 40% of glioblastomas
FISH or NGS copy numberDiagnostic of glioblastoma in IDH-wildtype astrocytoma.No effective EGFR-targeted drug or vaccine in glioma so far; trials only.
Chromosome +7 / −10Whole-chromosome 7 gain with 10 loss (10 carries PTEN).
Found in: Chromosome 10 loss in 60–85% of glioblastomas
Methylation array, NGS or FISH copy numberDiagnostic of glioblastoma in IDH-wildtype astrocytoma.Must be whole-chromosome; partial changes do not count.
PDGFRA, CDK4, MET amplification; PI3K mutationsGrowth-signal and cell-cycle drivers
Found in: Glioblastoma; aggressive or recurrent IDH-mutant astrocytoma
NGSPrognostic: PDGFRA amplification may imply grade 4 behaviour in IDH-mutant astrocytoma.No standard targeted therapy; trials. MET fusions and FGFR3-TACC3 fusions are rare trial targets.
MMR deficiency / hypermutationLoss of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2 → thousands of mutations
Found in: Germline Lynch or constitutional MMR deficiency (young, IDH-wildtype); acquired after temozolomide in 25–50% of recurrences (often MSH6)
MMR IHC; tumour mutational burden on NGS; germline testingPredictive: checkpoint inhibitors can work in germline CMMRD (Bouffet 2016[29]); temozolomide-induced hypermutation does not predict benefit (Touat 2020[20]). MSH6 loss → temozolomide resistance.Always ask whether hypermutation is germline or treatment-induced; refer families for genetics.

Paediatric-type gliomas and glioneuronal tumours: marker by marker

MarkerTypical tumourHow testedClinical relevance
H3 K27M / H3K27me3 loss (H3-3A, H3C2/3; EZHIP)Diffuse midline glioma: pons (DIPG), thalamus, spinal cord; children and young adultsIHC for K27M plus loss of K27me3; sequencingGrade 4 regardless of histology; survival usually under 1–2 years; dordaviprone at recurrence (pooled response 20%[30]). ACVR1 mutation often accompanies H3.1-mutant DIPG.
H3 G34R/VDiffuse hemispheric glioma, adolescents and young adultsMutation-specific IHC; sequencingGrade 4. Shares ATRX loss and p53 with IDH-mutant astrocytoma, so IDH must be checked.
KIAA1549-BRAF fusionPilocytic astrocytoma (60–80%, especially cerebellar)RNA NGS, FISH or RT-PCRGood prognosis after resection; tovorafenib or MEK inhibitors when progressive (FIREFLY-1[31]). First-generation BRAF inhibitors can paradoxically drive fusion-positive tumours: avoid them.
BRAF V600EPaediatric LGG (about 15–20%), ganglioglioma (up to 60%), PXA, epithelioid glioblastomaIHC (VE1) or sequencingDabrafenib + trametinib first line in paediatric LGG (Bouffet 2023[32]) and at recurrence in adults (ROAR[33]). With CDKN2A deletion: higher risk of transformation.
FGFR1/2/3 alterationsPaediatric-type diffuse LGG (FGFR1 duplication about a quarter), DNET, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumourNGS (DNA + RNA)Usually indolent; FGFR inhibitors in trials.
MYB / MYBL1 alterationsDiffuse astrocytoma MYB/MYBL1-altered, angiocentric gliomaRNA NGS, methylationCNS WHO grade 1: surgery is usually enough.
NF1 lossOptic pathway glioma in NF1; some sporadic LGGGermline testing / NGSSelumetinib or other MEK inhibitors (PBTC[34]); avoid RT in NF1 (second tumours, vasculopathy).
NTRK, ALK, ROS1, MET fusionsInfant-type hemispheric glioma and some paediatric HGGRNA NGSHighly responsive to matched TRK or ALK inhibitors: test every infant glioma.
PDGFRA, EGFR, MYCN amplificationDiffuse paediatric-type HGG, H3-wildtype and IDH-wildtypeNGS; methylation profiling is the reference testPoor prognosis; trials. Also reported in adults up to 70 years.

Important points

  • Read the layered report: integrated diagnosis (for example "Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 3"), then histology, then grade (Arabic numerals, assigned within the tumour type), then the molecular results. Plan treatment from the integrated line, not from histology alone.
  • Molecular results outrank appearance: TERT, EGFR or +7/−10 make an IDH-wildtype adult astrocytoma a glioblastoma; CDKN2A/B deletion makes an IDH-mutant astrocytoma grade 4; oligodendroglioma needs both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion, whatever it looks like.
  • NOS versus NEC: "not otherwise specified" means the test was not done or failed (ask for it); "not elsewhere classified" means it was done and the tumour does not fit a defined type (consider methylation profiling and MDT review).
  • Prognostic order of the adult groups: oligodendroglioma (median 15–20 years) > IDH-mutant astrocytoma (grade 2 >10 years, grade 3 7–9, grade 4 3–6) > IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (about 15 months in trials) (TCGA 2015[4], Eckel-Passow 2015[28]).
  • Markers that change treatment today: MGMT (temozolomide), 1p/19q (PCV with RT), IDH (vorasidenib), BRAF V600E (dabrafenib + trametinib), NTRK fusion (TRK inhibitors), H3 K27M (dordaviprone at recurrence), germline MMR deficiency (checkpoint inhibitors). EGFR, PTEN, CDKN2A and TERT are diagnostic and prognostic but not yet drug targets.
  • Imaging can hint, not decide: the T2–FLAIR mismatch sign is almost specific for IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-intact astrocytoma (Jain 2020[35]); calcification and cortical spread suggest oligodendroglioma; 2-HG on MR spectroscopy suggests an IDH mutation. Tissue is still required.
  • Germline clues: IDH1 R132C (Li-Fraumeni), MMR loss or hypermutation without prior temozolomide in a young patient (Lynch or constitutional MMR deficiency), NF1 features with optic pathway or pilocytic tumours, SHH medulloblastoma (TP53, SUFU, PTCH1). Refer for genetic counselling.
  • Common laboratory pitfalls: small or necrotic biopsies with low tumour content (undergrading, failed MGMT); FISH "codeletion" from partial losses; IDH IHC negative but sequencing positive; ATRX loss in H3 G34 tumours; H3 K27M also occurs in some non-diffuse tumours (ganglioglioma, ependymoma), so it defines diffuse midline glioma only in an infiltrative midline glioma.
  • Re-test at recurrence when it could change care: transformation (new CDKN2A/B deletion, PDGFRA amplification), hypermutation after temozolomide, or a new target. CSF or blood "liquid biopsy" is promising but not yet standard outside DIPG research.
  • A practical panel for Indian centres: on every diffuse glioma, IHC for IDH1 R132H, ATRX, p53 and Ki-67 (add H3 K27M for midline, BRAF VE1 for young or epithelioid tumours); 1p/19q by FISH or NGS when ATRX is retained; MGMT for every glioblastoma, above all in patients over 65; IDH sequencing when IHC is negative under 55; TERT/EGFR/CDKN2A by a targeted NGS panel when an IDH-wildtype tumour looks low grade; methylation profiling through a reference laboratory for paediatric, unusual or NEC tumours. Keep paraffin blocks and request molecular tests at the first MDT so results are ready when RT planning starts.
  • Guidance: WHO CNS5 (Louis 2021[36]), CAP/ASCO/SNO molecular testing guideline (2022)[37], EANO molecular testing guideline (2023)[38], EANO diffuse glioma guideline (2021)[39].
05 Local therapy: surgery & radiotherapy

Surgery

  • Glioma: maximal safe resection is the first step for every accessible diffuse glioma. More complete resection predicts longer survival in all molecular groups, most clearly in IDH-mutant astrocytoma, where even small residual volumes matter. Use awake mapping or tractography near eloquent cortex.
  • Biopsy (stereotactic or open) for deep, multifocal or bihemispheric tumours and when lymphoma is suspected. Take enough for molecular testing.
  • Single metastasis: resection plus radiotherapy beat radiotherapy alone in fit patients with controlled extracranial disease (Patchell 1990[40]: survival 40 vs 15 weeks, local recurrence 20 vs 52%; Vecht 1993[41]). Resect large (>3 cm), symptomatic or posterior fossa lesions with mass effect, or when the diagnosis is uncertain. Permanent weakness after surgery is about 8–9%.
  • Children: maximal safe resection, ideally in a paediatric neuro-oncology centre; gross total resection cures most pilocytic astrocytomas and is the strongest prognostic factor in ependymoma. Hydrocephalus: tumour removal, endoscopic third ventriculostomy or a shunt.

Radiotherapy

SettingUsual schedule (dose per course, no drug doses)Glioblastoma, ≤70 y, fit60 Gy in 30 fractions + daily temozolomideGrade 3 glioma59.4 Gy in 33 fractions (or 60/30)Grade 2 glioma (when RT chosen)50.4–54 Gy in 28–30 fractionsOlder or frail glioblastoma40 Gy in 15 fractions (or 25 Gy in 5)1–4 (up to ~10–15) small metastasesStereotactic radiosurgery, single or 3–5 fractionsResected metastasis cavityCavity SRS rather than whole brainMany metastases, no SRS optionWBRT 30 Gy in 10 (hippocampal avoidance + memantine)Medulloblastoma, ependymoma (spread)Craniospinal irradiation + boostDIPG54–59.4 Gy, or 39–45 Gy hypofractionatedInvolved-field RT: tumour (enhancement, cavity ± FLAIR) plus a margin; 80–90% of high-grade gliomas recur within 2 cm of the original site.
Figure 13. Radiotherapy schedules in common use (NRG, EORTC, ASTRO, EANO). Dose escalation above 60 Gy has not improved survival in glioblastoma; SRS has replaced whole-brain RT for most patients with limited metastases.
  • High-grade glioma: involved-field RT to the cavity and enhancing tumour (± FLAIR) with a margin. Dose escalation above 60 Gy (conventional, stereotactic boost, brachytherapy) has not improved survival; IMRT/VMAT spares normal brain and optic structures. Proton dose escalation is under study.
  • Older or frail glioblastoma: 40 Gy in 15 fractions is as effective as 60 Gy in 30 and spares 3 weeks of travel (Roa 2004); RT beat supportive care in patients over 70 (ANOCEF[42]).
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for up to 4, and in practice up to about 15–20, small metastases. Adding an SRS boost to WBRT improved survival for a single unresectable metastasis (RTOG 9508[43]). Adding whole-brain RT halves new intracranial relapse but does not prolong survival and worsens memory: EORTC 22952-26001[44], JROSG 99-1[45], N0574[46] (cognitive decline 92 vs 64% at 3 months). For 5–20 metastases, SRS gave better symptom scores than hippocampal-avoidance WBRT with similar survival (Aizer 2026[47]).
  • After resection: cavity SRS halves local recurrence compared with observation (Mahajan 2017[48]) and preserves cognition better than WBRT (N107C[49]). Large cavities (>2.5–3 cm) do better with fractionated SRS (3–5 fractions).
  • WBRT when SRS is not possible and prognosis is reasonable: hippocampal avoidance plus memantine (NRG CC001[50], RTOG 0614[51]). In poor-prognosis lung cancer patients WBRT added nothing to dexamethasone and supportive care (QUARTZ[52]).
  • Children: avoid RT under 3 years where possible (chemotherapy to delay it); focal conformal or proton RT for ependymoma and LGG; craniospinal RT plus boost for medulloblastoma (dose by risk group). Late effects: IQ decline (worse with younger age and larger fields), endocrine failure, hearing loss, second tumours, vasculopathy.
  • Reirradiation is reasonable for a focal relapse after a long interval; radiation-induced gliomas can be reirradiated after about 5 years. Re-RT plus bevacizumab improved PFS but not survival over bevacizumab alone in recurrent glioblastoma (RTOG 1205[53]).
06 Systemic therapy: indications & options

Indications and options only; no doses. Benefits are given in absolute terms where possible. Trial names link to the primary publications.

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype

IDH-wildtype glioblastoma after maximal safe resection or biopsy≤70 years, KPS ≥70• RT 60 Gy + daily temozolomide, then 6 monthly cycles• MGMT methylated: lomustine–temozolomide an option for young, fit patients• Add tumour-treating fields if the patient accepts• Unmethylated: same standard; consider trials>70 years, KPS ≥70• Short-course RT (40/15) + temozolomide• Methylated and frail: temozolomide alone• Unmethylated: short-course RT alone• Decide with the family; function firstKPS <70 (any age)• Methylated: temozolomide alone or short RT• Unmethylated: short RT or best supportive care• Early palliative care• Steroids at the lowest dose that worksNot recommended first line: bevacizumab (no survival gain: AVAglio, RTOG 0825), nivolumab (CheckMate 498), more than 6adjuvant cycles (GEINO 14-01).
Figure 14. Glioblastoma: age, function and MGMT decide the plan. MGMT methylation (40–50% of tumours) doubles 2-year survival with temozolomide; in unmethylated tumours the gain is small but no better option exists.
  • Standard (≤70, fit): RT with daily temozolomide, then 6 monthly cycles (EORTC/NCIC[54]): median survival 14.6 vs 12.1 months; 2-year survival 27 vs 11% and 5-year 10 vs 2% (5-year update[55]). Benefit concentrated in MGMT-methylated tumours.
  • Lomustine plus temozolomide for younger, fit patients with methylated tumours (CeTeG/NOA-09[56]): median 48 vs 31 months in the prespecified analysis, but only 141 patients and more toxicity; a reasonable option, not a mandate.
  • Tumour-treating fields with adjuvant temozolomide (EF-14[57]): median survival 20.9 vs 16.0 months from randomisation; worn ≥18 hours a day on a shaved scalp; unblinded. Availability and cost limit use in India.
  • What does not help first line: bevacizumab (PFS gain only; AVAglio[58], RTOG 0825[59]), nivolumab in unmethylated tumours (worse survival, CheckMate 498[60]), nivolumab–ipilimumab (NRG BN007[61]), dose-dense temozolomide (RTOG 0525[62]), continuing temozolomide beyond 6 cycles (GEINO 14-01[63]).
  • Older adults: short-course RT with temozolomide improved survival over short RT alone (Perry 2017[64], greatest if methylated); temozolomide alone is as good as RT in methylated tumours (Nordic[65], NOA-08[66]).
  • Practical points: weekly counts during RT (thrombocytopenia 10–20%, worse in women); PJP prophylaxis for patients on steroids or with lymphopenia; avoid routine PPIs (survival association in a pooled analysis); contraception and fertility counselling.

IDH-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma

  • Grade 2, residual tumour, no uncontrolled symptoms: vorasidenib, an oral IDH1/2 inhibitor, more than doubled PFS (27.7 vs 11.1 months) and delayed next intervention (INDIGO[23]); overall survival unknown; ALT rise in about 10%. After gross total resection, watchful waiting or vorasidenib by shared decision.
  • Grade 2 needing treatment, and all grade 3: RT plus chemotherapy, not RT alone. RTOG 9802[67]: RT + PCV median survival 13.3 vs 7.8 years. CATNON final[68]: 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide after RT in IDH-mutant grade 3 astrocytoma, median about 12.5 vs 6.8 years; concurrent temozolomide added little (consistent with the earlier interim report[69]).
  • Oligodendroglioma: RT + PCV doubled median survival in codeleted grade 3 tumours (RTOG 9402[70]: 13.2 vs 7.3 years; EORTC 26951[71]: 14.2 vs 9.3 years; joint final report[24]). Temozolomide is a reasonable, better-tolerated alternative; the CODEL trial compares them. Chemotherapy alone is inferior (EORTC 22033[72]) except for very large fields.
  • Grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma: RT with temozolomide, glioblastoma-style or with 12 adjuvant cycles.

Recurrent high-grade glioma

  • No therapy has been shown to prolong survival over another at recurrence; median survival about 8–9 months for glioblastoma. Choose by prior treatment, steroid dependence, oedema and goals.
  • Lomustine: lomustine + bevacizumab improved PFS (4.2 vs 1.5 months) but not survival (9.1 vs 8.6) (EORTC 26101[73], BELOB[74]). Bevacizumab is best used for symptomatic oedema and steroid toxicity. Temozolomide rechallenge for late relapse of a methylated tumour.
  • Nivolumab did not beat bevacizumab (CheckMate 143[75]). Genotype-directed: dabrafenib + trametinib for BRAF V600E (ROAR[33]), TRK inhibitors for NTRK fusions, dordaviprone for H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (response rate 20%[30]).
  • Re-resection helps selected focal relapses and distinguishes necrosis from tumour; offer palliative care alongside.

Brain metastases

New brain metastasesGPA by cancer type · systemic options · symptomsSingle, large or doubtful• Resection (mass effect, >3 cm, diagnosis unclear)• Then cavity SRS• Small/deep: SRS alone2–20 small (<3 cm)• SRS alone; no routine WBRT• MRI every 2–3 months• Driver-positive: CNS-active drug may come first>20 or poor prognosis• Good PS: WBRT with hippocampal avoidance + memantine• Poor PS, no options: steroids and supportive care (QUARTZ)• Palliative careAdding WBRT halves intracranial relapse but does not prolong life and harms memory (EORTC 22952, N0574, JROSG 99-1).
Figure 15. Brain metastases: fit the treatment to the number, size, symptoms and systemic options. EGFR- or ALK-positive lung cancer, HER2-positive breast cancer and melanoma on effective drugs may start with systemic therapy and close MRI surveillance.
  • CNS-active targeted drugs (osimertinib, alectinib, lorlatinib, tucatinib-based HER2 regimens, BRAF/MEK in melanoma) can be used first for small, asymptomatic metastases with MRI every 6–8 weeks; SRS for symptomatic, large or progressing lesions.
  • Immunotherapy with ipilimumab–nivolumab controls asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases in about half of patients; steroids blunt the effect, so avoid unnecessary dexamethasone.
  • Guidance: EANO-ESMO brain metastasis guideline (2021)[76] and ASCO-SNO-ASTRO guidelines; treatment is planned by cancer type and genotype at a multidisciplinary meeting.
  • Leptomeningeal disease: MRI brain and spine, CSF cytology; focal RT to symptomatic sites, systemic drugs that cross the CSF, intrathecal therapy in selected cases; prognosis is generally weeks to months.

Children

  • Low-grade glioma, unresectable and progressive: carboplatin–vincristine or weekly vinblastine (COG A9952[77]: 5-year OS 86–87% with either chemotherapy arm). BRAF V600E: dabrafenib + trametinib first line, response 47 vs 11% and PFS 20.1 vs 7.4 months versus chemotherapy (Bouffet 2023[32]). BRAF fusion/other RAF alterations: tovorafenib (FIREFLY-1[31], response 67%). NF1 and BRAF-altered: selumetinib (PBTC[34]). About half progress after first-line therapy; overall survival at 20 years is close to 90%.
  • High-grade glioma (>3 years): focal RT with temozolomide and adjuvant lomustine (ACNS0423[78]); bevacizumab added nothing (HERBY[79]). BRAF V600E: dabrafenib + trametinib after RT (Hargrave 2023[80]). Constitutional MMR deficiency: anti-PD-1 (Bouffet 2016[29]). Five-year survival 15–35%.
  • DIPG: RT is the only proven treatment; hypofractionation (39–45 Gy) is non-inferior and spares anaesthesia and travel (Zaghloul 2022[81]). No chemotherapy has improved survival; median survival under a year.
  • Ependymoma: maximal resection then focal RT; post-RT maintenance chemotherapy did not improve outcomes (ACNS0831[82]). Observation after complete resection of a supratentorial grade 2 tumour is an option.
  • Medulloblastoma: surgery, risk-adapted craniospinal RT and cisplatin-based chemotherapy; 5-year survival about 70–80% for average risk (higher for WNT). Infants: chemotherapy-based approaches to delay or avoid RT.
Steroids (dexamethasone)• Only for symptomatic oedema; none if asymptomatic• Load then 8–16 mg/day for severe, 2–4 mg/day for mild• Taper to the lowest dose; watch glucose, myopathy• Avoid before biopsy if lymphoma possibleSeizures• No prophylaxis if never had a seizure• After a seizure: levetiracetam (non-enzyme-inducing)• Avoid phenytoin/carbamazepine with chemo, TKIs• Rescue benzodiazepine at home near end of lifeVenous thrombosis• No routine prophylaxis except after surgery• Treat DVT/PE: DOAC preferred, else LMWH• Higher bleed risk: melanoma, RCC, thyroid, choriocarcinoma• Non-contrast CT before startingInfection and stomach• PJP prophylaxis if steroids or lymphopenia on temozolomide• H2 blocker rather than PPI with glioblastoma• Vaccinate; check sugar on steroids• Early palliative and rehabilitation input
Figure 16. Supportive care that changes everyday outcomes. Steroids are for symptoms, not for the scan; antiseizure drugs are for patients who have had a seizure; DOACs caused less intracranial bleeding than LMWH in glioma cohorts.

Quick-reference tables (also printable as one PDF from the Printable Teaching Resources page). No chemotherapy doses; check current approvals and product information.

Table A. Molecular tests and what they change

TestWhere it mattersHow testedWhat it changesKey evidence
IDH1/IDH2 mutationEvery adult diffuse gliomaIHC for IDH1 R132H; sequence codons 132/172 if negative (especially under 55)IDH-mutant: astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma, better prognosis; residual grade 2 → vorasidenib optionINDIGO[23], WHO 2021[36]
1p/19q codeletionEvery IDH-mutant gliomaNGS, methylation array or LOH (FISH alone is imperfect); ATRX retained/p53 negative suggests itDefines oligodendroglioma; RT + PCV (or temozolomide); chemotherapy alone for very large fieldsEORTC 26951/RTOG 9402[24]
MGMT promoter methylationGlioblastoma (all ages)Methylation-specific PCR or pyrosequencing; methylated in 40–50%Predicts temozolomide benefit; temozolomide alone is reasonable in frail methylated patientsHegi 2005[2]
CDKN2A/B homozygous deletionIDH-mutant astrocytoma (and oligodendroglioma)NGS or FISH/copy numberGrade 4 regardless of histology; poor prognosisCATNON final[68]
TERT promoter, EGFR amplification, +7/−10IDH-wildtype astrocytoma without necrosisNGS / copy numberDiagnose glioblastoma; treat as grade 4WHO 2021
H3 K27 alterationMidline glioma (thalamus, pons, spinal cord), children and young adultsIHC for H3 K27M and loss of H3K27me3Diffuse midline glioma grade 4; dordaviprone at recurrence; trialsONC201 pooled analysis[30]
H3 G34 mutationHemispheric high-grade glioma, teens and young adultsIHC / sequencingDiffuse hemispheric glioma grade 4WHO 2021
BRAF V600E / BRAF fusionPaediatric LGG, ganglioglioma, PXA, some adult gliomasIHC (VE1) or NGS; KIAA1549-BRAF fusion by NGS/FISHV600E: dabrafenib + trametinib; fusions: tovorafenib, MEK inhibitorsBouffet 2023[32], ROAR[33], FIREFLY-1[31]
MMR deficiency / hypermutationGlioma in young people with café-au-lait spots or family cancers; recurrence after temozolomideIHC for MMR proteins, TMB on NGS; germline testingCMMRD/Lynch counselling; checkpoint inhibitor in selected casesBouffet 2016[29]
Medulloblastoma group (WNT, SHH, group 3, group 4)All medulloblastomasIHC panel ± methylation; TP53 status in SHHRisk-adapted craniospinal dose and chemotherapy; germline testing in SHH (TP53, SUFU, PTCH1)WHO 2021, COG/SIOP protocols
Ependymoma group (ZFTA, YAP1, PFA/PFB)All intracranial ependymomasIHC (H3K27me3 loss = PFA), fusion testing; 1q gainPFA with 1q gain/6q loss: high risk; drives trial eligibilityACNS0831[82]

Table B. Systemic and radiation therapy by setting (no doses)

SettingStandardAlternatives / notesEvidence
Glioblastoma, ≤70 y, fitRT 60 Gy/30 + daily temozolomide → 6 adjuvant cyclesLomustine–temozolomide (methylated, young, fit); tumour-treating fields with adjuvant phaseEORTC/NCIC[54], CeTeG/NOA-09[56], EF-14[57]
Glioblastoma, >70 y or frailShort-course RT (40/15) + temozolomideMethylated: temozolomide alone; unmethylated: short RT alone; KPS <50: supportive carePerry 2017[64], Nordic[65], NOA-08[66]
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant grade 2, residual, no uncontrolled symptomsVorasidenib, or watchful waitingUncontrolled symptoms/growth: RT + temozolomide (12 cycles) or PCVINDIGO[23], RTOG 9802[67]
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant grade 3RT 59.4 Gy + 12 cycles adjuvant temozolomideConcurrent temozolomide adds little; PCV alternativeCATNON final[68]
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant grade 4RT + temozolomide (glioblastoma-style or 12 adjuvant cycles)TrialsExtrapolated from CATNON, EORTC/NCIC
Oligodendroglioma grade 2 (residual) or 3Grade 3: RT + PCV (or temozolomide); grade 2 residual: vorasidenib optionVery large field: chemotherapy firstEORTC 26951/RTOG 9402[24], RTOG 9802[67], INDIGO[23]
Recurrent glioblastomaSingle agent: lomustine, bevacizumab or temozolomide rechallenge (late, methylated)Re-resection or re-irradiation for focal relapse; trials; palliative careEORTC 26101[73], BELOB[74], RTOG 1205[53]
BRAF V600E glioma (any age)Dabrafenib + trametinibChildren with LGG: first line instead of chemotherapyROAR[33], Bouffet 2023[32]
Paediatric LGG, progressive, no V600ECarboplatin–vincristine or weekly vinblastineBRAF fusion: tovorafenib; NF1: selumetinib/MEK; RT for older children when neededCOG A9952[77], FIREFLY-1[31], PBTC selumetinib[34]
Paediatric HGG (>3 y)Focal RT + temozolomide → lomustineBRAF V600E: dabrafenib–trametinib after RT; CMMRD: anti-PD-1ACNS0423[78], Hargrave 2023[80]
DIPGFocal RT (conventional or hypofractionated)No proven systemic therapy; trials; re-irradiation at progressionZaghloul 2022[81]
Ependymoma, child, gross total resectionFocal conformal RTSupratentorial grade 2 GTR: observation possible; post-RT chemotherapy did not helpACNS0831[82], Merchant 2009[83]
Brain metastases, driver-positiveCNS-active targeted therapy (osimertinib, alectinib/lorlatinib, tucatinib-based HER2 regimens)SRS for symptomatic or progressing lesionsSee lung and breast modules
Brain metastases, 1–20 small, no CNS-active drugSRS aloneCavity SRS after resection; WBRT with hippocampal avoidance + memantine only if SRS not possibleN0574[46], N107C[49], NRG CC001[50]

Table C. Supportive care essentials

ProblemDoAvoidEvidence / note
Vasogenic oedemaDexamethasone only if symptomatic: about 10 mg load then 8–16 mg/day (severe) or 2–4 mg/day (mild); taper to the lowest doseSteroids for asymptomatic oedema; steroids before biopsy if lymphoma possibleVecht 1994[84]; bevacizumab for refractory oedema
Raised ICP, impending herniationHead up, IV dexamethasone, mannitol or hypertonic saline, urgent neurosurgery (shunt/ETV/resection)Lumbar puncture with mass effectEmergency
First seizureLevetiracetam monotherapy; check levels before switching; driving adviceProphylaxis in seizure-free patients; enzyme inducers (phenytoin, carbamazepine) with chemotherapy or TKIsSNO/EANO 2021[85]
Stopping antiseizure drugsConsider only after long seizure freedom and stable tumour; shared decisionAbrupt withdrawalAbout 1 in 4 glioma patients relapse after withdrawal
DVT / PENon-contrast CT first; DOAC preferred, LMWH if DOAC unsuitable; long-term for glioblastomaIVC filter routinely; anticoagulation within 48 h of a bleedCarney 2019[86], Leader 2020[87]
VTE preventionMechanical + pharmacological prophylaxis after surgery; mobiliseRoutine outpatient prophylaxisPRODIGE[88]
Infection on temozolomidePJP prophylaxis with steroids or lymphopenia; weekly counts during RTLive vaccinesNNT ~288 without risk factors (Canadian cohort)
Gastric protection on steroidsH2 blocker when neededRoutine PPIs with glioblastoma (survival association)Le Rhun 2025 pooled analysis
Cognition, mood, fatigueScreen each visit; rehabilitation, school/work plans; memantine with WBRTIgnoring carer burdenRTOG 0614[51]
End of lifeHome seizure rescue plan (buccal/nasal benzodiazepine), dysphagia plan, palliative careLate referralEANO palliative care guideline

Table D. Managing common treatment side effects

Side effectUsual causePrevent / monitorWhen to stop or refer
Thrombocytopenia, neutropeniaTemozolomide (2–3× more in women), lomustine, PCVWeekly counts during RT; day 22/29 counts in cyclesHold TMZ if platelets <100 or ANC <1.5 ×10⁹/L in the concurrent phase; aplastic anaemia is rare but serious
Nausea, constipationTemozolomide, lomustine, ondansetronAntiemetic before doses; bowel regimenPersistent vomiting: check ICP, hyponatraemia
Raised liver enzymesTemozolomide, vorasidenib (ALT rise ~10% grade ≥3)LFTs monthly early onHold for grade ≥3; restart lower or stop
Pulmonary fibrosisLomustine (cumulative)PFTs with long coursesNew breathlessness: stop and investigate
Hypertension, proteinuria, wound problemsBevacizumabBP each visit, urine proteinStop before surgery; stop for bleeding, perforation, arterial clot
Fever, rashDabrafenib + trametinibPause at fever onset; restart when settledPersistent fever, ejection fraction fall, eye symptoms
Skin irritation under arraysTumour-treating fieldsRotate array position, skin careUlceration or infection
Fatigue, hair loss, scalp dermatitisCranial RTExplain early; gentle scalp careSomnolence weeks after RT is usually self-limited
Steroid myopathy, diabetes, insomnia, infectionDexamethasoneLowest dose; morning dosing; glucose checksProximal weakness: taper; consider bevacizumab for steroid dependence
Cognitive declineWBRT, large-field RT, tumourSRS where possible; hippocampal avoidance; memantineNeuropsychology and rehabilitation
Endocrine, hearing, growth (children)Cranial/craniospinal RT, cisplatinYearly endocrine review; audiologyHormone replacement; school support
07 Management algorithms

These decision paths pull together sections 02–06. Colours: teal for favourable paths, purple for intermediate, rose for high-risk paths.

Algorithm 1Adult diffuse glioma
Suspected glioma on MRI: neuro-oncology MDT · steroids only if symptomatic · antiseizure drug only after a seizure · maximal safe resection (biopsy if deep or diffuse) · MRI in 24–48 h · integrated diagnosis: IDH, 1p/19q, CDKN2A/B, MGMT
IDH-mutant grade 2
Gross total resection → watchful waiting (MRI 3–6-monthly) or vorasidenib
Residual, no uncontrolled symptoms → vorasidenib (INDIGO)
Uncontrolled seizures, growth or progression → RT + chemotherapy
Oligodendroglioma: RT + PCV or temozolomide · astrocytoma: RT + 12 cycles temozolomide (or PCV)
IDH-mutant grade 3–4
Oligodendroglioma grade 3 → RT 59.4 Gy + PCV (or temozolomide)
Astrocytoma grade 3 → RT + 12 cycles adjuvant temozolomide (CATNON)
Astrocytoma grade 4 (incl. CDKN2A/B deleted) → RT + temozolomide
Very large or bihemispheric oligodendroglioma: chemotherapy first
Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype
≤70, KPS ≥70 → RT 60 Gy + temozolomide → 6 cycles ± TTFields
>70 or frail → 40/15 RT + temozolomide; methylated frail → temozolomide alone; unmethylated → short RT alone
KPS <50 → supportive and palliative care
MRI ~4 weeks after RT, then every 2–3 months; suspect pseudoprogression in the first 3–6 months
Recurrence: re-resection / re-RT if focal · lomustine, bevacizumab or temozolomide rechallenge · BRAF/NTRK/H3 K27M targets · trials

All patients: shared decisions about goals · driving and work advice after seizures · fertility and contraception · weekly counts and PJP prophylaxis (if steroids/lymphopenia) on daily temozolomide · avoid routine PPIs · rehabilitation and carer support · palliative care alongside, not instead.

Algorithm 2Brain metastases
New brain metastases: MRI with contrast (count and size) · systemic staging · tumour genotype · GPA · steroids only if symptomatic · neurosurgery and radiation oncology at the first MDT
Single, large, symptomatic or uncertain
Resection (mass effect, >3 cm, posterior fossa with hydrocephalus, diagnosis unclear)
Cavity SRS (single or 3–5 fractions) within about a month
Small, deep or eloquent single lesion → SRS alone
2–20 small lesions
CNS-active drug available (EGFR, ALK, HER2, BRAF, melanoma IO) → drug first, MRI every 6–8 weeks; SRS if symptomatic or progressing
No CNS-active drug → SRS alone
No routine WBRT; MRI every 2–3 months for new lesions → repeat SRS
Many lesions or poor prognosis
Good performance status, not SRS-suitable → hippocampal-avoidance WBRT + memantine (conventional WBRT if lesions within 5 mm of the hippocampi)
Poor performance status, no systemic options → dexamethasone, supportive and palliative care (QUARTZ)
Leptomeningeal disease: MRI spine, CSF; focal RT, CNS-active drugs

All patients: no prophylactic antiseizure drugs · DOAC or LMWH for VTE (individualise in melanoma, RCC, thyroid, choriocarcinoma) · taper steroids early, especially before immunotherapy · driving advice · discuss goals of care.

Algorithm 3Children with a brain tumour
Red flags (morning vomiting, ataxia, squint, head tilt, regression, headache ≤6 years) → urgent MRI (CT if unavailable) → paediatric neurosurgery the same day if hydrocephalus · steroids for oedema · staging: spine MRI, CSF, AFP/β-hCG where relevant · tissue + molecular (BRAF, H3, groups)
Low-grade glioma / glioneuronal
Resectable → gross total resection → MRI surveillance (cure in most)
Unresectable or progressive
BRAF V600E → dabrafenib + trametinib
BRAF fusion / NF1 → carboplatin–vincristine or vinblastine; tovorafenib or MEK inhibitor
Optic pathway glioma in NF1: treat for vision loss, not size alone
Embryonal and ependymoma
Medulloblastoma → resection → craniospinal RT by risk group + chemotherapy (≥3 years); chemotherapy-based under 3
Ependymoma → maximal resection (second look if residual) → focal RT; <1 year: chemotherapy bridge
Germline testing: SHH medulloblastoma (TP53, SUFU, PTCH1), ATRT (SMARCB1)
High-grade glioma and DIPG
Hemispheric HGG → maximal resection → focal RT + temozolomide → lomustine
BRAF V600E → dabrafenib + trametinib after RT · CMMRD → anti-PD-1
DIPG (diagnosed on MRI) → RT (conventional or hypofractionated) · steroids · trials · early palliative care

All children: paediatric neuro-oncology centre · fertility preservation where possible · school and neurocognitive support · lifelong late-effects clinic (endocrine, hearing, growth, second tumours) · family genetic counselling when a syndrome is suspected.

For neurosurgeons: primary brain tumoursReferral to oncology and adjuvant treatment by integrated diagnosis: specific indications, timing, what to send

Almost every patient with a malignant primary brain tumour needs radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both after surgery, and several decisions depend on what is done (and saved) at the operation. Final plans are made at the neuro-oncology MDT.

1Before and at surgery: discuss with oncology when

  1. 1
    Lymphoma is possible

    Periventricular, homogeneous, diffusion-restricting, or immunosuppressed patient: stereotactic biopsy only, and hold steroids if the patient is stable.

  2. 2
    A metastasis is likely

    Known cancer, multiple lesions, or a smoker over 40: stage the body first; resect only large, symptomatic or diagnostic lesions.

  3. 3
    Pineal or suprasellar mass

    Serum and CSF AFP and β-hCG and a spine MRI before any operation: germ cell tumours may need no resection.

  4. 4
    Deep, multifocal or frail

    Agree biopsy versus resection, and the questions the tissue must answer (IDH, MGMT, H3).

  5. 5
    Spine staging needed

    Children, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, germ cell tumours: spine MRI before surgery avoids post-operative artefact.

  6. 6
    After the operation

    MRI within 24–48 hours; keep enough tissue and the paraffin blocks for the full integrated diagnosis.

2Adjuvant management by integrated diagnosis: specific indications

Always / urgent refer every patient, usually before definitive treatment · Yes refer when the situation applies · Usually no specialist follow-up only

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, age ≤70, KPS ≥70Always
Plan
RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions with daily temozolomide, then 6 monthly cycles (EORTC/NCIC[54]); tumour-treating fields optional (EF-14[57]); lomustine–temozolomide for selected young, fit, MGMT-methylated patients (CeTeG/NOA-09[56])
Points
Referral: As soon as histology is known (do not wait for all molecular results. Start RT about 3–6 weeks after surgery once the wound has healed (common practice). Send MGMT. Weekly counts; PJP prophylaxis if on steroids.
Glioblastoma, age >70 or KPS 50–70Always
Plan
Short-course RT (40 Gy/15 or 25 Gy/5) with temozolomide if fit (Perry 2017[64]); MGMT-methylated and frail: temozolomide alone (Nordic[65], NOA-08[66]); unmethylated: short-course RT alone
Points
Referral: Choice depends on MGMT and function. Biopsy is enough when resection is unsafe; ask for MGMT on the biopsy. KPS <50: supportive and palliative care; discuss before surgery.
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 2 — gross total resectionYes
Plan
Watchful waiting (MRI every 3–6 months) or vorasidenib
Points
Referral: For a shared decision. IDH sequencing if IHC negative and age <55; CDKN2A/B status needed.
IDH-mutant glioma, grade 2 (astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma) — residual tumour, seizures controlled, no mass effectYes
Plan
Vorasidenib to delay RT and chemotherapy (INDIGO[23]: PFS 27.7 vs 11.1 months)
Points
INDIGO patients had non-enhancing measurable disease, no steroids, KPS ≥80. Monthly LFTs at first.
IDH-mutant glioma, grade 2 — uncontrolled seizures, growth, mass effect or enhancementYes
Plan
RT (50.4–54 Gy) plus chemotherapy: PCV (RTOG 9802[67], median survival 13.3 vs 7.8 years) or 12 cycles of temozolomide
Points
Referral: Promptly. Chemotherapy alone only when the RT field would be very large (bihemispheric oligodendroglioma).
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 3Always
Plan
RT 59.4 Gy, then 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (CATNON final[68]); concurrent temozolomide adds little
Points
No role for vorasidenib outside trials at grade 3.
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 4 (including CDKN2A/B-deleted)Always
Plan
RT with temozolomide (glioblastoma-style, or 12 adjuvant cycles)
Points
Report CDKN2A/B status: it changes the grade even without necrosis.
Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted, grade 3Always
Plan
RT 59.4 Gy plus PCV (or temozolomide if PCV cannot be given) (EORTC 26951/RTOG 9402[24]: survival about doubled)
Points
Whole-arm 1p/19q by NGS/methylation preferred to FISH alone.
Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered (thalamus, brainstem, cord)Always
Plan
Focal RT (about 54–60 Gy); clinical trials; dordaviprone at progression (ONC201[30])
Points
Resection usually not possible; stereotactic biopsy in an experienced centre.
Ependymoma, adultYes
Plan
Grade 3, or grade 2 with residual: focal RT. Grade 2 after gross total resection: RT or observation, individualised
Points
Stage with MRI of the whole spine (ideally before surgery) and CSF cytology about 2 weeks after surgery.
Meningioma, grade 1Usually no
Plan
Gross total resection: observe. Subtotal: observe, or RT/radiosurgery if growing or symptomatic
Points
Referral: Neurosurgical follow-up. MRI at 3–6 months, then yearly; per EANO meningioma guidance.
Meningioma, grade 2 (atypical)Yes
Plan
Subtotal resection: adjuvant RT. Gross total resection: RT or close MRI surveillance (randomised trials ongoing)
Points
Referral: Radiation oncology. Discuss at MDT; no proven chemotherapy.
Meningioma, grade 3 (anaplastic)Always
Plan
Adjuvant RT (about 60 Gy) whatever the extent of resection
Points
High recurrence risk; trials for recurrence.
Circumscribed gliomas: pilocytic astrocytoma, PXA, gangliogliomaIf residual or recurrent
Plan
Gross total resection: observe. Residual or progressive: re-resection, RT, or targeted therapy if BRAF V600E (ROAR[33])
Points
Ask for BRAF V600E (VE1) and BRAF fusion testing.
Primary CNS lymphoma (suspected)Urgent
Plan
Stereotactic biopsy only; then methotrexate-based chemotherapy and consolidation (autologous transplant or RT) under haemato-oncology
Points
Referral: Before definitive surgery. Withhold steroids before biopsy if the patient is stable; resection does not help. HIV test, eye (slit-lamp) and CSF studies.
Medulloblastoma or other embryonal tumour (adult or child)Always
Plan
Craniospinal RT with boost plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy (risk-adapted); infants: chemotherapy to delay RT
Points
Spine MRI and CSF staging; molecular group (WNT, SHH, group 3/4); germline testing for SHH.
Pineal or suprasellar mass (possible germ cell tumour)Before surgery
Plan
Germinoma: chemotherapy and/or RT, no radical resection; raised serum/CSF AFP or markedly raised β-hCG: chemotherapy first without biopsy
Points
Check serum and CSF AFP and β-hCG and spine MRI before any operation.
Resected brain metastasisAlways
Plan
Cavity SRS rather than whole-brain RT (Mahajan[48], N107C[49]), plus systemic therapy for the primary
Points
Referral: Radiation and medical oncology. Cavity SRS within about a month of surgery (3–4 weeks may lower side effects). Send tissue for EGFR/ALK/HER2/BRAF as relevant.
Any brain tumour in a childAlways
Plan
By type: focal or craniospinal RT, chemotherapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors for BRAF-altered LGG (Bouffet 2023[32])
Points
Referral: To a paediatric neuro-oncology team. Avoid RT under 3 years where possible; fertility, endocrine and school planning.

3What to send with the referral

  • Integrated pathology report: histology, CNS WHO grade, IDH (sequencing if IHC negative and under 55), ATRX, p53, 1p/19q, CDKN2A/B, Ki-67
  • MGMT for every glioblastoma; H3 K27M (midline), H3 G34 (young, hemispheric), BRAF V600E where relevant; blocks kept available
  • Pre-operative MRI and post-operative MRI within 24–48 hours (images, not just reports) for radiotherapy planning
  • Operation note: extent of resection, residual tumour and its location, eloquent areas, CSF leak or wound concerns
  • KPS or ECOG, deficits, seizures and the current antiseizure drug, steroid dose and taper plan, VTE prophylaxis or events
  • What the patient and family understand; for young adults, whether fertility has been discussed

Do

  • Refer high-grade tumours the same week the diagnosis is known; molecular results can follow.
  • Taper dexamethasone to the lowest dose that controls symptoms; H2-blocker rather than routine PPI.
  • Use levetiracetam for patients who have had seizures; stop perioperative prophylaxis if there were none (SNO/EANO[85]).
  • Give post-operative VTE prophylaxis; treat clots with a DOAC or LMWH after CT excludes bleeding.
  • Start radiotherapy about 3–6 weeks after surgery once the wound has healed (common practice).
  • Write driving advice after any seizure.

Avoid

  • Steroids before biopsy when lymphoma is possible and the patient is stable.
  • Enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital): they lower temozolomide, targeted drug and dexamethasone levels.
  • A late post-operative MRI (after about 72 hours): surgical enhancement hides residual tumour.
  • Reporting "glioma grade 2" without IDH and 1p/19q, or using up all tissue on frozen section.
  • Re-operating for early new enhancement within 3–6 months of chemoradiation without MDT review: often pseudoprogression.

Refer back, or re-discuss at the MDT, when

  • New or enlarging enhancement after treatment (pseudoprogression, recurrence or radiation necrosis).
  • Recurrence that may be resectable: re-resection, re-irradiation and systemic options are planned together.
  • Growth or new enhancement of a low-grade glioma under surveillance or on vorasidenib.
  • Steroid dependence or refractory oedema (bevacizumab option), uncontrolled seizures, or new VTE.
  • Hydrocephalus or a wound problem during radiotherapy.
08 Survivorship, follow-up & reducing recurrence
0246810Years after diagnosisShare free of progressionGlioblastoma: most relapse within a yearGrade 3 IDH-mutant astrocytomaOligodendroglioma after RT + PCV
Figure 17. When relapses happen (illustrative shapes from trial medians, not to scale). The pace differs tenfold between glioma types, so follow-up intensity and the meaning of a “stable” scan differ too.
End of RTYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5High-grade: MRI ~4 weeks after RT, then every 2–3 months for 2–3 yearsHigh-grade glioma: MRI + clinic (steroid dose, seizures, cognition, mood, blood counts on temozolomide)Low-grade glioma: MRI every 3–6 months for 5 years, then 6–12-monthly for life (more often on vorasidenib early)Metastases after SRS: MRI every 2–3 months for a year. Children: MRI per protocol;endocrine, hearing, growth, school and fertility review. Treat the person: driving and work advice,epilepsy safety, carer support, advance-care planning when appropriate.
Figure 18. A simple follow-up rhythm (NCCN, EANO). MRI drives follow-up; interpret early changes after chemoradiation with pseudoprogression in mind.
End of RT3 months6 months9 months12 monthsPeak pseudoprogressionStill possibleNew enhancement: think true progression or necrosisFavours pseudoprogression• Within 3–6 months of chemoradiation• Inside the high-dose field• MGMT methylated; patient well• Low perfusion (rCBV) on MRIFavours true progression• New lesion outside the field• Clinical decline off steroids• High rCBV; growth on serial MRI• Confirm with tissue if it changes care
Figure 19. Pseudoprogression. New enhancement soon after chemoradiation is often treatment effect; continue adjuvant temozolomide and repeat MRI in 4–8 weeks rather than abandoning effective therapy.

Follow-up protocol (NCCN, EANO)

TumourImagingAlso
Glioblastoma and other high-grade gliomasMRI about 4 weeks after RT, every 2–3 months during adjuvant therapy and for 2–3 years, then every 3–6 monthsBlood counts and LFTs on temozolomide; steroid taper; seizure review; cognition and mood
Low-grade glioma (grade 2), oligodendrogliomaMRI every 3–6 months for 5 years, then at least yearly for life (monthly LFTs and 3-monthly MRI early on vorasidenib)Late effects of RT: cognition, endocrine (if field near hypothalamus/pituitary)
Brain metastases after SRS or surgeryMRI every 2–3 months in year 1, then every 3–6 monthsRadiation necrosis in 10–25%, more with immunotherapy or targeted therapy; perfusion MRI or tissue to separate from relapse
ChildrenMRI per protocol (often 3-monthly in year 1); spine MRI for medulloblastoma/ependymomaGrowth, puberty, thyroid, cortisol, hearing (cisplatin), vision, IQ and school, second tumours, stroke risk after RT
  • Pseudoprogression (new enhancement within 3–6 months of chemoradiation, commoner when MGMT is methylated) settles without a change of therapy; continue temozolomide and repeat MRI in 4–8 weeks unless the patient deteriorates.
  • Seizures and driving: patients should not drive until seizure-free for the period required by local rules (commonly 6–12 months) and should be told so in writing. Antiseizure drugs may be tapered after long seizure freedom with stable disease, but about 1 in 4 glioma patients relapse.
  • Steroids: plan the taper at every visit; long-term dexamethasone causes myopathy, diabetes, infections, insomnia and Cushingoid change.
  • Rehabilitation and return to work or school: early physiotherapy, occupational and speech therapy; neuropsychology for cognitive complaints; written plans for teachers.
  • Carers and goals: carers of people with high-grade glioma carry a heavy load; discuss goals and preferred place of care early, and leave a home seizure-rescue plan near the end of life.
09 Landmark trials
012243648600%25%50%75%100%Months from randomisationNew treatmentControl1MedianThe time at which half thepatients have had the event. Amedian gain of a few months canhide a long tail of survivors.2Hazard ratioRelative risk of the event at anymoment (0.70 = 30% lower risk). Itis not an absolute difference.3Absolute differenceThe vertical gap at a fixed time(here about 20 points at 4 years).NNT = 100 ÷ gap.4The tailA plateau suggests some patientsgain long-term control: thetypical immunotherapy pattern.5Crossover and PFSIf control patients get the newdrug later, overall survivaldifferences shrink; a PFS gainalone may not mean longer life.1342
Figure 20. How to read a survival curve (illustrative). Use the absolute gap at a fixed time and overall survival, not the median or PFS alone, when weighing benefit against toxicity and cost.
  • EORTC/NCIC (2005)[54]: RT ± temozolomide in glioblastoma → median 14.6 vs 12.1 months, 5-year 10 vs 2% → the standard of care for fit adults ≤70.
  • Hegi (2005)[2]: the same trial by MGMT status → benefit mostly when methylated → MGMT testing guides older and frail patients.
  • EF-14[57]: tumour-treating fields with adjuvant temozolomide → median survival 20.9 vs 16.0 months → an option for willing patients; not sham-controlled.
  • AVAglio[58] / RTOG 0825[59]: bevacizumab first line → longer PFS, no survival gain, more toxicity → a lesson in PFS versus OS.
  • Perry (2017)[64]: 40/15 RT ± temozolomide over 65 → median 9.3 vs 7.6 months, larger if methylated → standard for older fit patients.
  • RTOG 9802[67]: RT ± PCV in high-risk low-grade glioma → median 13.3 vs 7.8 years → chemotherapy belongs with RT.
  • CATNON final[68]: adjuvant temozolomide after RT in non-codeleted grade 3 glioma → benefit confined to IDH-mutant tumours (HR 0.54) → 12 adjuvant cycles; concurrent adds little.
  • EORTC 26951 / RTOG 9402[24]: RT ± PCV in anaplastic oligodendroglioma → median survival about doubled in codeleted tumours with 20-year follow-up.
  • INDIGO[23]: vorasidenib vs placebo in residual grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma → PFS 27.7 vs 11.1 months → first targeted drug for glioma; survival unknown.
  • EORTC 26101[73]: lomustine ± bevacizumab at first recurrence → PFS gain, no survival gain.
  • Patchell (1990)[40]: surgery + WBRT vs WBRT for a single metastasis → survival 40 vs 15 weeks → resection for fit patients with a single lesion.
  • N0574[46]: SRS ± WBRT for 1–3 metastases → better control but more cognitive decline (92 vs 64%) and no survival gain → SRS alone.
  • N107C[49]: cavity SRS vs WBRT after resection → less cognitive decline, similar survival.
  • QUARTZ[52]: WBRT vs supportive care in poor-prognosis lung cancer → no difference in survival or quality-adjusted life → spare WBRT when life expectancy is short.
  • Bouffet (2023)[32]: dabrafenib–trametinib vs carboplatin–vincristine in BRAF V600E paediatric LGG → response 47 vs 11%, PFS 20.1 vs 7.4 months, fewer severe side effects → first-line targeted therapy.
  • ACNS0831[82]: post-RT chemotherapy in childhood ependymoma → no gain → focal RT alone after resection.
  • Zaghloul (2022)[81]: 39–45 Gy hypofractionated vs 54 Gy in 253 children with DIPG → non-inferior survival → shorter course for families.
10 Practice pearls & pitfalls
  • A first seizure in an adult is an indication for MRI with contrast, not just an EEG and a prescription.
  • Do not start dexamethasone "to be safe" before a biopsy when lymphoma is on the list; if the patient is stable, wait for tissue.
  • Weakness that melts on steroids is oedema; plan the taper on the day you start.
  • Patients who have never had a seizure do not need antiseizure prophylaxis; if a drug is needed, levetiracetam avoids interactions with chemotherapy and TKIs (phenytoin and carbamazepine induce their metabolism).
  • Ask the pathologist for an integrated diagnosis; "glioma, grade 2" without IDH and 1p/19q is not enough to plan treatment in 2026.
  • MGMT methylation is the best single guide to treatment in older or frail patients with glioblastoma; send it with the first block.
  • Early new enhancement after chemoradiation is often pseudoprogression: confirm before stopping effective therapy.
  • Hypofractionated RT (40 Gy in 15) shortens the course for older patients who travel long distances, without losing efficacy.
  • Procarbazine supply can be unreliable; temozolomide is a reasonable partner for RT in oligodendroglioma when PCV cannot be completed.
  • Most brain metastases need neither WBRT nor prophylactic antiseizure drugs; SRS and the right systemic drug do more with less harm.
  • An EGFR- or ALK-positive patient with small, asymptomatic brain metastases may start the TKI and have MRI in 6–8 weeks.
  • Anticoagulation is usually safe with brain tumours; DOACs caused less intracranial bleeding than LMWH in glioma cohorts. Individualise in melanoma, RCC, thyroid cancer and choriocarcinoma metastases.
  • In a child, persistent morning vomiting, a new squint or head tilt is a brain MRI question, not a gastric one.
  • Test BRAF in every paediatric low-grade glioma; V600E changes first-line therapy.
  • Diagnose DIPG on MRI; biopsy only in a specialised centre, for atypical features or a trial.
  • Neurocysticercosis and tuberculoma are common in India, but a growing lesion on treatment is a biopsy question.
11 Case vignettes: lines of management

Eight cases, written for postgraduates and practising clinicians. Read the presentation, decide on diagnosis, workup and plan, then open the line of management. No doses are given.

Case 1Oligodendroglioma · grade 2 · residual

A first seizure in a 34-year-old engineer

34 years, manRight frontal, non-enhancingIDH1 R132H, 1p/19q codeleted

A 34-year-old software engineer has a generalised seizure at work. He recalls brief episodes of a strange smell for a year. Examination is normal. MRI: a 5 cm right frontal T2/FLAIR-bright mass with indistinct borders and no enhancement; CT shows small calcifications.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Seizure care
    Levetiracetam; no driving (written advice); steroids not needed with no symptomatic oedema.
  2. Surgery
    Awake craniotomy with mapping; near-total resection, 6 cm³ residual near the motor strip. MRI at 24 hours confirms the residual.
  3. Integrated diagnosis
    IDH1 R132H mutant, 1p/19q whole-arm codeleted, CDKN2A/B intact, no anaplasia: oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted, CNS WHO grade 2.
  4. Postoperative plan
    Residual disease and controlled seizures: options are vorasidenib (INDIGO; delays progression and next intervention) or watchful waiting with 3-monthly MRI. He chooses vorasidenib; monthly LFTs at first.
  5. If it grows or seizures become uncontrolled
    RT (54 Gy) plus PCV or temozolomide; expected median survival is well over a decade. Fertility and work counselling.

Teaching points

  • A seizure with a non-enhancing frontal mass in a young adult is a low-grade glioma until proven otherwise.
  • IDH and 1p/19q decide the name, the prognosis and the drug.
  • Vorasidenib postpones RT; it has not yet been shown to prolong life.

See: Sections 02–06 · Algorithm 1 · INDIGO[23], RTOG 9802[67]

Case 2Glioblastoma · MGMT methylated

Word-finding difficulty in a 58-year-old teacher

58 years, womanLeft temporal ring-enhancingIDH-wildtype, MGMT methylated

A 58-year-old teacher has 3 weeks of word-finding difficulty and headache. MRI: a 4 cm left temporal mass with an irregular enhancing rim, central necrosis and surrounding oedema. CT chest-abdomen is not needed; there is no history of cancer.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Before surgery
    Dexamethasone for symptomatic oedema, tapered after surgery; no seizure prophylaxis.
  2. Surgery
    Awake craniotomy, gross total resection of the enhancing tumour; speech preserved.
  3. Diagnosis
    Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4; TERT promoter mutant; MGMT promoter methylated.
  4. Adjuvant therapy
    RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions with daily temozolomide (weekly counts; PJP prophylaxis while on steroids), then 6 monthly cycles. Tumour-treating fields discussed. Lomustine–temozolomide is an option for her as fit and methylated, with more toxicity.
  5. At 2 months
    New enhancement at the cavity rim, she is well: likely pseudoprogression. Continue temozolomide; MRI in 6 weeks shows improvement.

Teaching points

  • Methylated glioblastoma treated with standard chemoradiation has a median survival near 2 years.
  • Early new enhancement within the RT field is often pseudoprogression.
  • Avoid routine PPIs; use H2 blockers if needed.

See: Sections 04, 06, 08 · Algorithm 1 · EORTC/NCIC[54], Hegi[2], EF-14[57], CeTeG/NOA-09[56]

Case 3Glioblastoma · older adult · unmethylated

Confusion in a 76-year-old farmer

76 years, manKPS 70MGMT unmethylated

A 76-year-old farmer from a village 120 km away has 6 weeks of confusion and left-sided weakness. MRI: a butterfly mass crossing the corpus callosum. He is diabetic and lives with his son.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Tissue
    Stereotactic biopsy (resection not possible): glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype; MGMT unmethylated.
  2. Goals conversation
    Median survival is under a year; the family wants treatment that keeps him at home as long as possible.
  3. Plan
    Unmethylated, over 70, KPS 70: short-course RT (40 Gy in 15, or 25 Gy in 5) alone; temozolomide adds little when unmethylated. If methylated, temozolomide alone or short RT with temozolomide would be options.
  4. Supportive care
    Lowest effective dexamethasone with glucose monitoring; physiotherapy; early palliative care; home seizure plan if seizures occur.

Teaching points

  • Age, performance status and MGMT decide treatment in older adults.
  • Shorter RT courses reduce travel without losing benefit.
  • Palliative care belongs at diagnosis.

See: Sections 05–06 · Algorithm 1 · Perry 2017[64], Nordic[65], ANOCEF[42]

Case 4Ring lesion · India trap · lymphoma

Four months of treatment for a "tuberculoma"

48 years, womanPeriventricular, solidSteroids already started

A 48-year-old woman was started on antituberculous drugs and dexamethasone 4 months ago for a left periventricular enhancing lesion. She improved briefly, then became drowsy and unsteady. Repeat MRI: two homogeneously enhancing periventricular masses with restricted diffusion. HIV negative.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Recognise the pattern
    Homogeneous, diffusion-restricting periventricular masses suggest primary CNS lymphoma; the transient response to steroids fits.
  2. Prepare for biopsy
    Taper dexamethasone if she is stable (steroids can make the biopsy non-diagnostic); stereotactic biopsy, not resection.
  3. Staging
    Slit-lamp eye examination, CSF cytology and flow cytometry, CT or PET body, testicular/bone marrow per protocol.
  4. Treatment
    High-dose methotrexate-based induction in a centre experienced with it, then consolidation by fitness. Stop antituberculous treatment once TB is excluded.

Teaching points

  • A growing lesion on antituberculous treatment needs tissue.
  • Steroids before biopsy can hide lymphoma.
  • Lymphoma is treated with chemotherapy, not resection.

See: Sections 02–03 · WHO 2021[36]

Case 5Brain metastases · EGFR lung cancer

Three small brain metastases at diagnosis

52 years, woman, never-smokerEGFR exon 19 deletion3 lesions, largest 9 mm

A 52-year-old never-smoker has stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR exon 19 deletion. Staging MRI shows three asymptomatic metastases, the largest 9 mm, with minimal oedema.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Steroids and seizures
    None: asymptomatic, no seizures.
  2. First treatment
    Osimertinib, which penetrates the CNS well; MRI at 6–8 weeks and then every 2–3 months.
  3. If a lesion grows or causes symptoms
    SRS to that lesion while continuing the TKI.
  4. What to avoid
    Upfront whole-brain RT: no survival gain, cognitive harm, and it may limit future options.

Teaching points

  • Genotype changes the brain plan as well as the body plan.
  • Small, asymptomatic metastases can be watched on a CNS-active drug with close MRI.
  • Keep SRS in reserve.

See: Sections 05–06 · Algorithm 2 · N0574[46], GPA[1]

Case 6Brain metastasis · surgery + SRS · VTE

Vomiting and unsteadiness after breast cancer

61 years, womanTriple-negative breast cancer3.5 cm cerebellar lesion

A 61-year-old woman treated for triple-negative breast cancer 2 years ago has a week of vomiting and unsteadiness. MRI: a single 3.5 cm right cerebellar metastasis compressing the fourth ventricle with early hydrocephalus. Body CT: two small lung nodules.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Urgent care
    Dexamethasone; same-day neurosurgical review.
  2. Surgery
    Resection of the cerebellar metastasis relieves hydrocephalus and confirms the diagnosis.
  3. After surgery
    Cavity SRS (fractionated for a large cavity) within about a month rather than WBRT (N107C, Mahajan); taper dexamethasone; systemic therapy for the lung disease.
  4. Two weeks later: calf DVT
    Non-contrast CT shows no haemorrhage; start a DOAC (or LMWH), continued while cancer is active.

Teaching points

  • Large posterior fossa metastases with mass effect go to the surgeon.
  • Cavity SRS beats WBRT for cognition and observation for local control.
  • Anticoagulation is usually safe after a brain metastasis is treated.

See: Sections 05, 06, 08 · Algorithm 2 · Patchell[40], N107C[49], Mahajan 2017[48], Leader 2020[87]

Case 7Child · posterior fossa · pilocytic

A 6-year-old treated for worms

6 years, girlCerebellar cystic massKIAA1549-BRAF fusion

A 6-year-old girl has 2 months of early-morning vomiting, treated twice for worms and acidity. Her mother notices she walks unsteadily and tilts her head. Fundi show papilloedema.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Image now
    Urgent MRI (CT if MRI unavailable): a cystic left cerebellar mass with an enhancing mural nodule and obstructive hydrocephalus.
  2. Same-day neurosurgery
    Dexamethasone; relieve hydrocephalus; gross total resection.
  3. Diagnosis
    Pilocytic astrocytoma, CNS WHO grade 1, KIAA1549-BRAF fusion.
  4. After surgery
    No further treatment after gross total resection; MRI surveillance; late-effects follow-up is light. If it had been incomplete and progressive: chemotherapy or a RAF/MEK inhibitor.

Teaching points

  • Morning vomiting with ataxia in a child is a brain tumour until proven otherwise.
  • A cyst with a mural nodule in the cerebellum is classically pilocytic astrocytoma.
  • Complete resection cures most cerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas.

See: Sections 02, 05 · Algorithm 3 · COG A9952[77]

Case 8Child · hypothalamic LGG · BRAF V600E

Vision loss and weight loss in a 9-year-old

9 years, boySuprasellar massBRAF V600E

A 9-year-old boy has 6 months of falling school marks, bumping into doors and weight loss. MRI: a large suprasellar/hypothalamic enhancing mass; visual fields show bitemporal loss. Endocrine tests: low free T4 and cortisol.

Before you open the answer: what is the likely diagnosis, what must be done before treatment, and what is the plan?

Show the line of management
  1. Stabilise
    Hydrocortisone before thyroxine; ophthalmology baseline.
  2. Tissue
    Partial resection/biopsy (radical resection would injure the hypothalamus): low-grade glioma with BRAF V600E.
  3. Treatment
    Dabrafenib + trametinib first line (response 47 vs 11% and longer PFS than carboplatin–vincristine); monitor for fever, skin, eyes and heart function.
  4. Long term
    Vision, endocrine replacement, school support; RT reserved for later and avoided where possible.

Teaching points

  • Replace cortisol before thyroxine.
  • BRAF testing changes first-line therapy in paediatric LGG.
  • Function (vision, hormones, learning) is the goal as much as tumour control.

See: Sections 04, 06 · Algorithm 3 · Bouffet 2023[32]

12 References & guidelines
  • WHO Classification of Tumours: Central Nervous System Tumours, 5th edition (2021), and cIMPACT-NOW updates.
  • NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Central Nervous System Cancers (current version).
  • EANO guidelines on adult diffuse gliomas (2021); EANO-ESMO guidelines on brain metastases (2021) and on neurological and vascular complications (2021); EANO-EURACAN-SNO guidelines on circumscribed gliomas and glioneuronal tumours (2022); EANO ependymoma guideline (2018).
  • ASCO-SNO guidelines on therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumours in adults; ASTRO guidelines on radiotherapy for glioblastoma (2025) and brain metastases; SNO/EANO guideline on antiseizure prophylaxis (2021).
  • Children’s Oncology Group and SIOP-Europe protocols for paediatric low-grade glioma, medulloblastoma and ependymoma; CBTRUS statistical reports; GLOBOCAN 2022 (India).
  • Cross-checked in October 2026 against 24 UpToDate topic reviews (clinical features and diagnosis in adults and children, headache, risk factors, classification, molecular pathogenesis, oligodendroglioma pathology and treatment, IDH-mutant astrocytoma, glioblastoma initial treatment, radiation therapy for high-grade glioma, high-grade glioma surgery, recurrent high-grade glioma, vasogenic oedema, seizures, venous thromboembolism, brain metastasis treatment, uncommon brain tumours, paediatric epidemiology and management, paediatric low- and high-grade glioma, DIPG and ependymoma). Facts only, written in our own words, citing primary sources; dose tables were not used.

Core trials cited on this page (88)

Journal, year, volume and first page; each links to the PubMed record by exact citation.

Numbered in order of first citation in the text

  1. Graded Prognostic Assessment 2020: Sperduto PW, Mesko S, Li J, et al. Survival in patients with brain metastases: summary report on the updated diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3773. PubMed Brain metastases
  2. MGMT predicts benefit (Hegi): Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:997. PubMed Glioblastoma
  3. TCGA glioblastoma core pathways (2008): Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008;455:1061. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  4. TCGA lower-grade glioma: Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, et al. Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2481. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  5. Longitudinal trajectories of diffuse glioma (GLASS 2019): Barthel FP, Johnson KC, Varn FS, et al. Longitudinal molecular trajectories of diffuse glioma in adults. Nature 2019;576:112. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  6. Glioblastoma arises from SVZ cells (Lee 2018): Lee JH, Lee JE, Kahng JY, et al. Human glioblastoma arises from subventricular zone cells with low-level driver mutations. Nature 2018;560:243. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  7. IDH1 discovery in glioblastoma (Parsons 2008): Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 2008;321:1807. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  8. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas (Yan 2009): Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 2009;360:765. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  9. Mutant IDH1 produces 2-hydroxyglutarate (Dang 2009): Dang L, White DW, Gross S, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 2009;462:739. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  10. Glioma CpG island methylator phenotype (Noushmehr 2010): Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, et al. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 2010;17:510. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  11. IDH1 mutation establishes hypermethylation (Turcan 2012): Turcan S, Rohle D, Goenka A, et al. IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature 2012;483:479. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  12. Insulator dysfunction and PDGFRA activation (Flavahan 2016): Flavahan WA, Drier Y, Liau BB, et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 2016;529:110. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  13. 2-HG suppresses antitumour T cells (Bunse 2018): Bunse L, Pusch S, Bunse T, et al. Suppression of antitumor T cell immunity by the oncometabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate. Nat Med 2018;24:1192. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  14. t(1;19) mediates 1p/19q loss (Jenkins 2006): Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV, et al. A t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res 2006;66:9852. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  15. CIC and FUBP1 mutations in oligodendroglioma (Bettegowda 2011): Bettegowda C, Agrawal N, Jiao Y, et al. Mutations in CIC and FUBP1 contribute to human oligodendroglioma. Science 2011;333:1453. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  16. FGFR-TACC fusions in glioblastoma (Singh 2012): Singh D, Chan JM, Zoppoli P, et al. Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma. Science 2012;337:1231. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  17. Glioblastoma expression subtypes (Verhaak 2010): Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010;17:98. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  18. Single-cell heterogeneity in glioblastoma (Patel 2014): Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 2014;344:1396. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  19. MSH6 loss during temozolomide (Cahill 2007): Cahill DP, Levine KK, Betensky RA, et al. Loss of the mismatch repair protein MSH6 in human glioblastomas is associated with tumor progression during temozolomide treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:2038. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  20. Temozolomide-induced hypermutation (Touat 2020): Touat M, Li YY, Boynton AN, et al. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas. Nature 2020;580:517. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  21. Histone H3.3 driver mutations in paediatric glioblastoma (Schwartzentruber 2012): Schwartzentruber J, Korshunov A, Liu XY, et al. Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature 2012;482:226. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  22. H3F3A and IDH1 hotspots define subgroups (Sturm 2012): Sturm D, Witt H, Hovestadt V, et al. Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2012;22:425. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  23. INDIGO: Mellinghoff IK, van den Bent MJ, Blumenthal DT, et al. Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-mutant low-grade glioma. N Engl J Med 2023;389:589. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  24. EORTC 26951/RTOG 9402 joint report: Lassman AB, Hoang-Xuan K, Polley MC, et al. Joint final report of EORTC 26951 and RTOG 9402: phase III trials with PCV chemotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:2539. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  25. cIMPACT-NOW update 5: Brat DJ, Aldape K, Colman H, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 5: recommended grading criteria and terminologies for IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol 2020;139:603. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  26. Grading IDH-mutant astrocytoma (Shirahata 2018): Shirahata M, Ono T, Stichel D, et al. Novel, improved grading system(s) for IDH-mutant astrocytic gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2018;136:153. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  27. cIMPACT-NOW update 3: Brat DJ, Aldape K, Colman H, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 3: diagnostic criteria for diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 2018;136:805. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  28. Glioma groups by 1p/19q, IDH and TERT (Eckel-Passow): Eckel-Passow JE, Lachance DH, Molinaro AM, et al. Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2499. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  29. Checkpoint inhibitors in bMMRD glioblastoma: Bouffet E, Larouche V, Campbell BB, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition for hypermutant glioblastoma multiforme resulting from germline biallelic mismatch repair deficiency. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2206. PubMed Children
  30. Dordaviprone in H3 K27M glioma (Arrillaga-Romany): Arrillaga-Romany I, Gardner SL, Odia Y, et al. ONC201 (dordaviprone) in recurrent H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:1542. PubMed Recurrent glioma
  31. FIREFLY-1: Kilburn LB, Khuong-Quang DA, Hansford JR, et al. The type II RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in relapsed/refractory pediatric low-grade glioma: the phase 2 FIREFLY-1 trial. Nat Med 2024;30:207. PubMed Children
  32. Dabrafenib-trametinib in paediatric glioma (Bouffet 2023): Bouffet E, Hansford JR, Garrè ML, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in pediatric glioma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1108. PubMed Children
  33. ROAR: Wen PY, Stein A, van den Bent M, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAF V600E-mutant low-grade and high-grade glioma (ROAR). Lancet Oncol 2022;23:53. PubMed Recurrent glioma
  34. Selumetinib in paediatric LGG (PBTC): Fangusaro J, Onar-Thomas A, Young Poussaint T, et al. Selumetinib in paediatric patients with BRAF-aberrant or NF1-associated recurrent, refractory, or progressive low-grade glioma. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1011. PubMed Children
  35. T2-FLAIR mismatch sign (Jain 2020): Jain R, Johnson DR, Patel SH, et al. "Real world" use of a highly reliable imaging sign: "T2-FLAIR mismatch" for identification of IDH mutant astrocytomas. Neuro Oncol 2020;22:936. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  36. WHO CNS5 summary: Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1231. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  37. Molecular biomarker testing guideline (CAP/ASCO/SNO 2022): Brat DJ, Aldape K, Bridge JA, et al. Molecular biomarker testing for the diagnosis of diffuse gliomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022;146:547. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  38. EANO molecular testing guideline: Capper D, Reifenberger G, French PJ, et al. EANO guideline on rational molecular testing of gliomas, glioneuronal, and neuronal tumors in adults for targeted therapy selection. Neuro Oncol 2023;25:813. PubMed Molecular pathogenesis, classification and testing
  39. EANO diffuse glioma guideline: Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M, et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021;18:170. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  40. Patchell 1990: Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW, et al. A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 1990;322:494. PubMed Brain metastases
  41. Vecht 1993 (surgery for single metastasis): Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H, Noordijk EM, et al. Treatment of single brain metastasis: radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgery? Ann Neurol 1993;33:583. PubMed Brain metastases
  42. ANOCEF RT in the elderly: Keime-Guibert F, Chinot O, Taillandier L, et al. Radiotherapy for glioblastoma in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1527. PubMed Glioblastoma
  43. RTOG 9508: Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for one to three brain metastases: RTOG 9508. Lancet 2004;363:1665. PubMed Brain metastases
  44. EORTC 22952-26001: Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, et al. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or resection of one to three cerebral metastases: EORTC 22952-26001. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:134. PubMed Brain metastases
  45. JROSG 99-1: Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for brain metastases. JAMA 2006;295:2483. PubMed Brain metastases
  46. N0574: Brown PD, Jaeckle K, Ballman KV, et al. Effect of radiosurgery alone vs radiosurgery with whole brain radiation therapy on cognitive function in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. JAMA 2016;316:401. PubMed Brain metastases
  47. SRS vs hippocampal-avoidance WBRT (Aizer 2026): Aizer AA, Shin KY, Catalano PJ, et al. Treatment for brain metastases with stereotactic radiation vs hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation. JAMA 2026;335:1127. PubMed Brain metastases
  48. Mahajan postoperative SRS: Mahajan A, Ahmed S, McAleer MF, et al. Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1040. PubMed Brain metastases
  49. N107C: Brown PD, Ballman KV, Cerhan JH, et al. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3). Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1049. PubMed Brain metastases
  50. NRG CC001: Brown PD, Gondi V, Pugh S, et al. Hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy plus memantine for patients with brain metastases: NRG Oncology CC001. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:1019. PubMed Brain metastases
  51. RTOG 0614 memantine: Brown PD, Pugh S, Laack NN, et al. Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2013;15:1429. PubMed Brain metastases
  52. QUARTZ: Mulvenna P, Nankivell M, Barton R, et al. Dexamethasone and supportive care with or without whole brain radiotherapy in NSCLC brain metastases unsuitable for resection or stereotactic radiotherapy (QUARTZ). Lancet 2016;388:2004. PubMed Brain metastases
  53. RTOG 1205: Tsien CI, Pugh SL, Dicker AP, et al. NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: concurrent bevacizumab and reirradiation versus bevacizumab alone for recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:1285. PubMed Recurrent glioma
  54. EORTC/NCIC temozolomide: Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987. PubMed Glioblastoma
  55. EORTC/NCIC 5-year: Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:459. PubMed Glioblastoma
  56. CeTeG/NOA-09: Herrlinger U, Tzaridis T, Mack F, et al. Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09). Lancet 2019;393:678. PubMed Glioblastoma
  57. EF-14: Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma. JAMA 2017;318:2306. PubMed Glioblastoma
  58. AVAglio: Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W, et al. Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2014;370:709. PubMed Glioblastoma
  59. RTOG 0825: Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, et al. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2014;370:699. PubMed Glioblastoma
  60. CheckMate 498: Omuro A, Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, et al. Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Neuro Oncol 2023;25:123. PubMed Glioblastoma
  61. NRG BN007: Lassman AB, Polley MC, Iwamoto FM, et al. Dual immune checkpoint blockade in MGMT-unmethylated newly diagnosed glioblastoma: NRG Oncology BN007. J Clin Oncol 2025;43:3032. PubMed Glioblastoma
  62. RTOG 0525 dose-dense temozolomide: Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, et al. Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:4085. PubMed Glioblastoma
  63. GEINO 14-01: Balana C, Vaz MA, Sepúlveda JM, et al. A phase II randomized trial of continuing adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles in glioblastoma (GEINO 14-01). Neuro Oncol 2020;22:1851. PubMed Glioblastoma
  64. Short-course RT ± temozolomide in older adults (Perry): Perry JR, Laperriere N, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. Short-course radiation plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1027. PubMed Glioblastoma
  65. Nordic elderly trial: Malmström A, Grønberg BH, Marosi C, et al. Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:916. PubMed Glioblastoma
  66. NOA-08: Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C, et al. Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:707. PubMed Glioblastoma
  67. RTOG 9802: Buckner JC, Shaw EG, Pugh SL, et al. Radiation plus procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine in low-grade glioma. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1344. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  68. CATNON final: van den Bent MJ, Ghisai SA, Wick W, et al. Concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON): final and exploratory analyses. Lancet Oncol 2026;27:45. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  69. CATNON: van den Bent MJ, Tesileanu CMS, Wick W, et al. Adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON): second interim analysis. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:813. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  70. RTOG 9402: Cairncross G, Wang M, Shaw E, et al. Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term results of RTOG 9402. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:337. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  71. EORTC 26951: van den Bent MJ, Brandes AA, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Adjuvant PCV chemotherapy in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term follow-up of EORTC 26951. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:344. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  72. EORTC 22033: Baumert BG, Hegi ME, van den Bent MJ, et al. Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033-26033). Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1521. PubMed IDH-mutant gliomas
  73. EORTC 26101: Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1954. PubMed Recurrent glioma
  74. BELOB: Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM, et al. Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB). Lancet Oncol 2014;15:943. PubMed Recurrent glioma
  75. CheckMate 143: Reardon DA, Brandes AA, Omuro A, et al. Effect of nivolumab vs bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: CheckMate 143. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:1003. PubMed Recurrent glioma
  76. EANO-ESMO brain metastasis guideline: Le Rhun E, Guckenberger M, Smits M, et al. EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2021;32:1332. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  77. COG A9952: Ater JL, Zhou T, Holmes E, et al. Randomized study of two chemotherapy regimens for treatment of low-grade glioma in young children: COG A9952. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2641. PubMed Children
  78. ACNS0423: Jakacki RI, Cohen KJ, Buxton A, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by temozolomide and lomustine in children with high-grade glioma: COG ACNS0423. Neuro Oncol 2016;18:1442. PubMed Children
  79. HERBY: Grill J, Massimino M, Bouffet E, et al. Phase II randomized trial (HERBY) of bevacizumab in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:951. PubMed Children
  80. Dabrafenib-trametinib in paediatric HGG: Hargrave DR, Terashima K, Hara J, et al. Phase II trial of dabrafenib plus trametinib in relapsed/refractory BRAF V600-mutant pediatric high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:5174. PubMed Children
  81. DIPG hypofractionation (Zaghloul 2022): Zaghloul MS, Nasr A, Tolba M, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a noninferiority randomized study including 253 children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022;113:360. PubMed Children
  82. ACNS0831: Smith AA, Onar-Thomas A, Lensing S, et al. Phase 3 randomized trial of postirradiation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed ependymoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Neuro Oncol 2026;28:1286. PubMed Children
  83. St Jude conformal RT for ependymoma: Merchant TE, Li C, Xiong X, et al. Conformal radiotherapy after surgery for paediatric ependymoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:258. PubMed Children
  84. Dexamethasone dose trial (Vecht 1994): Vecht CJ, Hovestadt A, Verbiest HB, et al. Dose-effect relationship of dexamethasone on Karnofsky performance in metastatic brain tumors: a randomized study of doses of 4, 8, and 16 mg per day. Neurology 1994;44:675. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  85. SNO/EANO seizure-prophylaxis guideline: Walbert T, Harrison RA, Schiff D, et al. SNO and EANO practice guideline update: anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1835. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  86. DOAC bleeding in glioma (Carney 2019): Carney BJ, Uhlmann EJ, Puligandla M, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with brain tumors. J Thromb Haemost 2019;17:72. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  87. DOAC bleeding in brain metastases (Leader 2020): Leader A, Hamulyák EN, Carney BJ, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with brain metastases. Blood Adv 2020;4:6291. PubMed Classification and supportive care
  88. PRODIGE (dalteparin prophylaxis): Perry JR, Julian JA, Laperriere NJ, et al. PRODIGE: a randomized placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:1959. PubMed Classification and supportive care

How to cite this page

VancouverChiramana H. Brain Tumours: a mini review for clinicians. Oncology Knowledge Hub [Internet]. Nellore (India): drharitha.co.in; 2026 [updated 2026 Oct 9; cited year month day]. Available from: https://drharitha.co.in/professionals/brain-tumours

APA 7Chiramana, H. (2026, October 9). Brain Tumours: A mini review for clinicians. Oncology Knowledge Hub. Retrieved Month Day, Year, from https://drharitha.co.in/professionals/brain-tumours

Free to use and share for education with attribution; please do not alter or use commercially (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Replace the italic parts with the date you accessed the page.

Educational summary for health professionals, written in our own words from current guidelines and primary trials. No chemotherapy doses are given. Verify current guidelines, Indian regulatory approvals and individual patient factors before treatment decisions.

Dr. Haritha Chiramana
Written by Dr. Haritha ChiramanaSenior Medical Oncologist & Hemato-Oncologist · MD, DM (Medical Oncology) · C.R. Reddy Cancer Center, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

Medically reviewed by Dr. Haritha Chiramana on 8 October 2026. This page is general education and cannot replace an individual consultation.